Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Ruby Sahota

Liberal on Public Safety 2026-04-23

80 words · 4 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Arpan Khanna (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, the police are doing their jobs, but it is this Liberal government that is failing Canadians. The Liberals promised 1,000 new RCMP officers and 1,000 new border guards, but they failed to deliver them. The AG says that, in Canada, we are short 3,400 RCMP officers. Meanwhile, illegal guns and illegal drugs keep pouring across our borders and into our communities. Will the Liberals stop recycling their speeches and finally act to protect Canadians?”

Statement grade

C+

Average 66 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 68%Positioning 11%The ask 21%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 38 wordswe have implemented the strongest tightening of the Criminal Code of Canada ever in the history of this Parliament.Unearned certainty We are putting forward legislation that would provide law enforcement with the tools they need to catch drug traffickers, ¹Positioning · 9 wordsbut the Conservatives have delayed many of these tools.²Positioning Claims · 16 wordsLawful access should have been passed months ago. Finally, now it is at the committee stage, ³The ask · 17 wordsand I hope the Conservatives listen to law enforcement and provide them with the help they need.Off point

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 85

1 of 6 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “but the Conservatives have delayed many of these tools.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 43

4 of 6 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “but the Conservatives have delayed many of these tools.”Turns the answer into an attack on the Conservatives’ delays rather than addressing the question about protecting communities.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Lawful access should have been passed months ago.”Continues the partisan point about Conservative obstruction instead of the question asked.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Finally, now it is at the committee stage,”Reports the bill’s procedural status as a way to keep pressing the Conservatives, not to answer the question.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “and I hope the Conservatives listen to law enforcement and provide them with the help they need.”Closes with another call for the Conservatives to change, a political point in place of an answer.

Respect · no score

Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 71

1 of 6 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.What the tags mean “the strongest tightening of the Criminal Code of Canada ever”A superlative asserted with no source or measure to support it.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“legislation that would provide law enforcement with the tools they need to catch drug traffickers”The government’s proposed lawful access legislation would give law enforcement tools to catch drug traffickers.search
2“the Conservatives have delayed many of these tools”Conservative MPs have delayed the government’s lawful access legislation.search
3“now it is at the committee stage”The lawful access legislation is currently at committee stage in Parliament.search

Analysed on 2026-09-15