Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Luc Berthold

105 words · 8 sentences · 12 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, it is not about power at all costs. It is, as the Prime Minister has indicated, about delivering for Canadians, building Canada strong for all. That is what we are advocating for. The principle and parliamentary tradition are very clear. Even our Standing Orders state that when a party has a majority of seats in the House, it has a majority of seats in our standing committees. Does the member believe that the opposition can work collaboratively with the government on trying to pass important legislation and on other matters?”
Statement grade
C
Average 64 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 67%Positioning 28%Procedure 6%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 30 wordswe did. The first thing we did as an opposition was to collaborate with the government on the bill to more quickly make each and every big project.1 We collaborated, Positioning · 15 wordsbut unfortunately the Liberals thought it was not enough. They thought they could do better, PositioningClaims · 40 wordsbut after a year, things are not better in Canada with the new Prime Minister, another Liberal prime minister. They are worse.Unearned certainty We have the only shrinking economy in the G7, 2and food inflation is the worst in the G7.3 Procedure · 6 wordsI could go on and on.Procedure Positioning · 14 wordsIt is a bad government, and we cannot put all our confidence in it.PositioningOff point

Analysed on