Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Tako Van Popta

78 words · 6 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, it is becoming more clear that the Conservative Party is positioning itself once again to say no to important legislation. It is not recognizing the importance of the modern treaty and the role that a commissioner can play. Contrary to listening to what indigenous people are saying about the need for a commissioner, the Conservatives are actually saying no. It is not only a no to the government, but also to recognizing that the need is genuine and that, at the end of the day, having modern treaties and an individual responsible for reporting is a good thing. Why will the Conservative Party not support indigenous people and the government—”
Statement grade
A+
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 77%The question 23%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 60 wordswe are absolutely supporting the modern treaty process. We underline how important it is. We underline that treaties are better than endless litigation, which we are seeing in British Columbia. I would just add that the government has mismanaged the litigation file seriously, just as it was mismanaging the treaty implementation. The Auditor General has reported on it numerous times.1 The question · 18 wordsWhy do the Liberals not just fill the deficiencies, roll up their sleeves and get the job done?

Analysed on