“Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the comments of my colleague. I want to amplify the fact that, by having this independent commissioner, we would really be providing more accountability and more transparency, at a time when Canadians have an expectation. We see that in terms of the government’s drive to build a stronger and healthier economy and in the importance of things such as the modern treaties. These are ways we can demonstrate clearly that, working collaboratively, we can make a difference and build a stronger Canada. When we look at Bill C-10, we see that it would be an important aspect of legislation in ensuring that there is more transparency and accountability through the establishment of a commissioner. Would the member not agree with that?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 90 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 86%Reasoning 14%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 121 wordsI absolutely would agree.As my friend so well knows, these are not commitments that are made and then forgotten.Unearned certaintyWe continue to make new commitments, Vague promiseand we continue to attempt to honour the commitments already made, including those structures that my hon. friend has pointed out, Vague promiseas well as the commitments we make in this House and the commitments we make in debate by drawing attention to the treaties.In my riding, it is the Williams Treaty and the Dish with One Spoon Treaty.1There are some very specific treaties that are involved that, even centuries later, we have to be attentive to.There are new treaties, as my colleague points out, that result in real commitments and real benefits.Reasoning · 20 wordsTo have a lens on that with an outside voice that is commenting on this to parliamentarians is really critical.
