Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Mark Carney

Liberal on The Economy 2026-09-21

83 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Pierre Poilievre (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, to the Prime Minister, welcome back to Parliament. To the Canadian people, the message of Conservatives is that we will fight to save Canadians money this session of Parliament: save them money on their rent and mortgage, save them money on gas and groceries and save them money here at home at their kitchen table, where they are paying more than ever for food because the Prime Minister is costing them. He doubled the deficit and has increased industrial carbon taxes and other fuel taxes, driving up their cost of living. The Prime Minister said in March that affordability was the best it has been in a decade. Does he believe that, or would he admit that people are paying more than ever?”

Statement grade

B–

Average 74 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Aside 8%Promise 49%Claims 42%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Aside · 7 wordsthere is a reason we have Hansard.Aside Promise · 23 wordsThis government will continue to work, without fail, to improve affordability for Canadians, cutting taxes on income and cutting taxes for first-time homebuyers.Vague promise Claims · 18 wordsThe groceries and essentials benefit’s next cheque is coming in October, with 12 million Canadians getting the benefit.¹² Promise · 18 wordsAbove all, we will be providing the essential social services that the member voted against, every single one: ³Claims · 17 wordschild care, dental care and the national school food program, with $20,000 of savings for Canadian families.⁴Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
Echo ×4“Dental care and the national school food program.” Said 4 times by 4 members.Every time it was said

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 89

1 of 6 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

A remark off to the side of the point.What the tags mean “there is a reason we have Hansard.”An aside: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 45

4 of 6 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “This government will continue to work, without fail, to improve affordability for Canadians, cutting taxes on income and cutting taxes for first-time homebuyers.”It lists the government’s tax measures on affordability without addressing whether the Prime Minister stands by his March remark or concedes prices are higher.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “The groceries and essentials benefit’s next cheque is coming in October, with 12 million Canadians getting the benefit.”It gives details of the groceries benefit but does not answer whether affordability is the best in a decade or Canadians are paying more.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “Above all, we will be providing the essential social services that the member voted against, every single one:”It turns to social services the member opposed rather than the affordability claim or admission asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “child care, dental care and the national school food program, with $20,000 of savings for Canadian families.”It names social programs and a savings figure without addressing the question about the Prime Minister’s stated view on affordability.

Respect · 100

0 of 6 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 64

1 of 6 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “will continue to work, without fail, to improve affordability”The core commitment is to keep working with no date, measure or success condition, and ‘without fail’ is a guarantee added in place of one.

Echo · 1 repeated line

Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.

“Dental care and the national school food program.”Said 4 times by 4 members.Every time it was said

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“The groceries and essentials benefit’s next cheque is coming in October”The next Canada groceries and essentials benefit payment is scheduled for October 2026.search
2“12 million Canadians getting the benefit”12 million Canadians are receiving the Canada groceries and essentials benefit.search
3“the member voted against, every single one”Pierre Poilievre voted against child care, dental care and the national school food program.search
4“with $20,000 of savings for Canadian families”Child care, dental care and the national school food program together provide $20,000 of savings for Canadian families.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20