← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down. Average 71 / 100
Signal
59 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
43 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
82 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 34% Claims 37% The question 29%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 36 words what Canadians expect the government to do is two things at the same time: No reason given Unearned certainty first and foremost, to always stand up for Canada, and second, to make sure that it is also saving money for Canadians. Positioning Claims · 40 words The countertariffs are already creating all kinds of knock-on effects in the Canadian economy. Canadians are losing jobs, including in my riding, such as at Invista, 1 Logical leap which has already closed its operation, putting more than 100 people out of work.2 The question · 31 words What we want to know is which part of the Conservative plan that we have proposed to help bring down costs for Canadian families are the Liberals willing to adopt today.
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×3 No reason given Unearned certainty Logical leap
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 59
3 of 6 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “what Canadians expect the government to do is two things at the same time:” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “first and foremost, to always stand up for Canada,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and second, to make sure that it is also saving money for Canadians.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 43
2 of 6 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “what Canadians expect the government to do is two things at the same time:” The two expectations are simply stated and then restated in the two parts that follow, with no ground offered for why the government should do both.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “Canadians are losing jobs, including in my riding, such as at Invista,” The job losses at Invista, including the closure putting over 100 people out of work, are offered as reasons, but one example in one riding is used to carry the general claim of economy-wide damage without a stated link showing the tariffs caused it.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “The countertariffs are already creating all kinds of knock-on effects in the Canadian economy.”
Because “Canadians are losing jobs, including in my riding, such as at Invista,”
“which has already closed its operation, putting more than 100 people out of work.”
Reason flawed The job losses at Invista, including the closure putting over 100 people out of work, are offered as reasons, but one example in one riding is used to carry the general claim of economy-wide damage without a stated link showing the tariffs caused it.
Conclusion “what Canadians expect the government to do is two things at the same time:”
Because No reason given
No reason given The two expectations are simply stated and then restated in the two parts that follow, with no ground offered for why the government should do both.
Respect · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 82
1 of 6 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “what Canadians expect the government to do” The speaker asserts what Canadians as a whole expect without offering any source for that claim.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Canadians are losing jobs, including in my riding, such as at Invista” Michael Barrett’s riding includes workers at Invista who are losing jobs due to knock-on effects of Canada’s countertariffs. search 2 “which has already closed its operation, putting more than 100 people out of work” Invista has closed its operation in Michael Barrett’s riding, putting more than 100 people out of work. search
