Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

143 words · 8 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Sébastien Lemire (Bloc Québécois)
“Madam Speaker, it is a pleasure to see you again, and the member for Winnipeg North as well. Bill C‑10 is important to me. In my capacity as critic for indigenous relations, I met with people from the Land Claims Agreements Coalition. I remember meeting Jim Aldridge, who has unfortunately passed away, and seeing how much he contributed for the groups. In committee, I interviewed Chief John Jack, who also appreciates this heritage. It is important to remember that this bill was co-developed, which means that we, as parliamentarians, must also be sensitive to the outcomes of this bill. Why are we here? We are here because the government has failed, year after year, decade after decade, to uphold its commitments to indigenous signatories to modern treaties and ensure the implementation of those modern treaties. Of course, program funding is an important issue. The Auditor General has produced many reports and follow-up reports on the government’s inaction. What will creating a commissioner position achieve? It will allow us, as parliamentarians, to take note of any red flags, so we know what to ask questions about. Personally, I see that as a good thing. Does the member for Winnipeg North see it as a sign of the government’s failure to keep its word to indigenous signatories to modern treaties?”
Statement grade
C+
66 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 18%Claims 78%Promise 4%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Thanks · 26 wordsI am grateful and appreciate that the Bloc has recognized the value of Bill C-10 and is working with the government to see its ultimate passage.Thanks Claims · 111 wordsIt is really encouraging that less than 18 months ago, Canadians elected a new government, a new Prime Minister and 70-plus new Liberal MPs.1Off point At the end of the day, this has been established as a high priority for the Prime Minister. That is the reason we are debating the bill today at third reading.2 That is the reason I spent as much time as I did at the very beginning of my comments asking for the Conservatives to reconsider their positioning and at the very least let us pass the legislation. I can assure members that the Prime Minister wants to see it passed. That is why we prioritized it. Promise · 6 wordsHopefully it will pass relatively soon.Partly on point

Analysed on