Analysis · Debate question · beta

Leah Gazan

160 words · 9 sentences · 12 clauses

Following a speech by Leslie Church (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the member for Winnipeg Centre for her commitment to Canadian workers. We are firmly committed to protecting workers’ rights and ensuring a free and fair collective bargaining process. Workers must have real bargaining power. The right to strike is protected in Canada because it is an essential element of free and balanced negotiations. Our government has taken concrete measures to protect that right. Bill C-58 was a major milestone in the fight for fairness at the bargaining table. Prohibiting the use of replacement workers protects a meaningful right to strike and makes employers and unions work together and find solutions. Collective bargaining works. Over the last five years, 95% of disputes that the federal mediation and conciliation service supported were resolved without work stoppages. This shows the system works well when the right support tools are available. However, negotiation is not a simple process, and we are at a pivotal moment. Trade rules are rapidly changing, and our economy faces unprecedented attacks. This is having damaging consequences. At the same time, Canada is working to build major infrastructure, strengthen trade corridors and supply chains, and create good jobs across the country through measures such as Bill C-39. Some labour disputes can therefore have serious economic repercussions, but we cannot build a strong economy without respecting the workers who keep it running every day. That is why Bill C-39 proposes measures to modernize the federal labour framework, strengthen protections for workers in federally regulated industries and help parties address issues earlier, while fully protecting the right to strike. We all have a stake in ensuring an economy can withstand shocks and remain competitive. In some situations, the economic and social impacts are substantive. There can be extraordinary times where the government must retain the ability to intervene, but there should be a clear framework in place to explain that decision to Canadians transparently. I want to be very clear: Our government believes that extraordinary interventions in a labour dispute should always be a last resort. Canadians appreciate this. They know that prolonged disputes can have a massive impact on Canadian families, Canadian jobs and our entire economy. Canadians understand that we must do two things at once: We must protect workers and strengthen economic resilience. They know that when there are strong, supported relationships between employers and workers, where workers are fairly paid and their concerns are addressed, that is the best way to create stability, and that stability drives investment and economic growth, which Canada needs today more than ever. The members opposite need to remember that Canadians chose a government that they knew would keep the state of labour relations strong. Our approach must be pragmatic. We continue to work together with unions and employers to maintain trust in the system and ensure fairness in the workplace. Our collective objective is clear. It is to strengthen good-faith bargaining, protect workers’ rights and ensure a strong labour relations framework that helps achieve better outcomes for workers, for employers and for Canadians.”
Statement grade
B
Average 79 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 16%Procedure 11%Claims 73%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 6 wordsthat was a good story time.PositioningPartly on point Procedure · 18 wordsI am going to quote my good friend, President Mark Hancock, from the Canadian Union of Public Employees.Procedure Claims · 117 wordsHe said, “[W]e will not win this trade war or make Canada stronger by stripping away the Charter rights of our own people.”1 He also said, “Gutting hard-won rights and protections for Canada’s workers will not help this government deliver certainty – it will do the opposite.” We know the Liberals have used section 107 forcefully to shut down the right to strike eight times in just 18 months.2Unearned certainty Every time they have shut down a strike, the Liberals in this House have made new excuses for violating workers’ constitutionally protected bargaining rights. We know that, at the CEO summit, the government was selling off Canadian public assets like airports, 3Unearned certaintywhich is getting push-back already from Unifor, Partly on pointPositioning · 19 wordsand that the government is not on the side of workers. It is smashing down rights. It is shameful.Positioning

Analysed on