“Mr. Speaker, first of all, as I expressed at the beginning of the discussions and debates, there are a number of ideas out there. We are very happy and grateful that the Conservatives are supporting Bill C-38. It will make a difference for Canadians. However, to address the member’s comments, I will say that this is only one initiative that the government has brought in to support Canadians on the issue of affordability. I want to follow up with a very specific question. The member made reference to a senior who did not qualify for the dental program, and that was part of the problem. Does the member support universal free access to dental care? Is that what he is advocating, because that is not—”
Statement grade
B
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 86. The grade is held to 76, 30 above Relevance.
76 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
The question 95%The ask 5%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, The question · 91 wordsI would love to ask that senior why they do not qualify and why the government keeps getting up and trumpeting, as if this program were the best thing in the world, when a lot of the seniors, especially in my riding, do not even qualify in the first place.Why are there two signals, two messages?When we are really talking affordability, why is the senior so confused that they cannot get the dental plan that the Liberals are championing as the best thing in the world since sliced bread?The ask · 5 wordsJust be honest with Canadians.Partly on point
