← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 72. The grade is held to 39, 30 above Relevance. 39 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
9 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
80 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 74% Reasoning 26%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 71 words we have a very active anti-poverty caucus that is all-party.1 It includes members of Parliament and senators.2 We have had lots of expert witnesses. Off point We would be the first. Honestly, there is tons of research that shows that it would save our health care system. Unearned certainty Poverty is the number one social determinant of health.3 It would save our criminal justice system and make our society fair. It would reduce costs everywhere. Reasoning · 27 words With the advent of AI coming for people’s jobs, putting in place a guaranteed livable income is the best way we can protect ourselves for the future. Off point Claims · 5 words We would be the first.
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×8 Unearned certainty Off topic Only 10% of this statement directly addressed the matter under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 9 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 9
8 of 9 deductions are Relevance
The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the bill.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “we have a very active anti-poverty caucus that is all-party.” About the member’s anti-poverty caucus, not the fuel excise tax bill or the point put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It includes members of Parliament and senators.” About the caucus’s membership, not the bill or the point put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have had lots of expert witnesses.” About expert witnesses heard, not the bill or the point put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Honestly, there is tons of research that shows that it would save our health care system.” About research on savings to the health care system from a guaranteed livable income, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Poverty is the number one social determinant of health.” About poverty as a health determinant, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It would save our criminal justice system and make our society fair.” About savings to the criminal justice system from a guaranteed livable income, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It would reduce costs everywhere.” About broad cost reductions from a guaranteed livable income, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “With the advent of AI coming for people’s jobs, putting in place a guaranteed livable income is the best way we can protect ourselves for the future.” About protecting against job losses from AI through a guaranteed livable income, not the bill.
Respect · 100
0 of 9 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 80
1 of 9 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “there is tons of research” Asserts a body of evidence without naming or citing any of it.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “we have a very active anti-poverty caucus that is all-party” There is an all-party anti-poverty caucus in Canada’s Parliament. search 2 “It includes members of Parliament and senators” Canada’s anti-poverty caucus includes both members of Parliament and senators. search 3 “Poverty is the number one social determinant of health” Poverty is ranked as the number one social determinant of health. search
