Analysis · Speech on a bill · beta

Kerry Diotte

Conservative on Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 2026-09-22

1309 words · 100 sentences · 126 clauses

Statement grade

B+

80 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 3%Claims 64%The ask 10%The question 6%Reasoning 14%Anecdote 1%Positioning 2%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 32 wordsI rise today to speak to this act to amend the Excise Tax Act and extend the federal fuel excise tax relief. At its core, the legislation would do something very simple.Procedure Claims · 103 wordsIt would extend the suspension of the federal excise tax on gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel until January 31, 2027.⁹ Then the tax would come back. On February 1, the government would bring it back at half the regular rate, ¹⁰and on April 1, the regular excise tax rates would return.¹¹ Canadians need relief at the pumps, and Conservatives have been pushing for exactly that. The Liberals originally planned to bring this tax back after Labour Day, and Conservatives pushed for the relief to continue. Canadians made clear that they are struggling with the cost of living, and the government changed its timeline. The ask · 10 wordsNow we are asking the Prime Minister to listen again. Claims · 114 wordsConservatives are proposing to extend broader federal fuel tax relief until at least Canada Day 2027, ¹⁵because families in Edmonton Griesbach and right across the country are still struggling to afford their lives. They need to fill their cars, buy groceries, heat their homes and get to work without wondering what new cost is coming next. Under the bill, the current suspension would continue through January, ¹²and beginning February 1 the federal excise tax on gasoline would come back at five cents per litre.¹³ Diesel and aviation fuel would come back at two cents per litre.¹⁴ By April, the regular rates would be back. Conservatives believe that Canadians should get that relief for longer. The question · 44 wordsIf the Prime Minister recognizes that lowering fuel taxes helps Canadians today, why not extend that relief until at least Canada Day, and why stop with the excise tax? Why not look at other federal costs on fuel? Why not look at the GST? Claims · 49 wordsConservatives under Prime Minister Harper cut the GST from 7% to 5%, ⁵and that relief stayed.⁶ Conservatives are calling for all federal taxes on gas and diesel to be removed until at least Canada Day 2027. That includes the GST and the cost associated with the clean fuel regulations, Reasoning · 13 wordsbecause every dollar matters to a family trying to make its budget work. Claims · 87 wordsTake a family filling up a 60-litre tank. At 10¢ a litre, that is six dollars in federal excise tax relief every time they fill up. That six dollars becomes $12, then $18 and then $24. For a family with two vehicles, it adds up even faster. That matters when they are buying groceries, when the mortgage payment is due, when the kids need new shoes or when the hydro bill comes in. The impact goes well beyond the family filling up at the local gas station. Anecdote · 14 wordsI think about the farmer, the trucker, the contractor or the small business owner.Anecdote Claims · 100 wordsFuel is not optional for these Canadians. It is the cost of doing business. A trucker cannot deliver food without diesel. A farmer cannot operate equipment without fuel. A contractor cannot carry lumber and tools to a job site on the bus. For millions of Canadians, driving is not a luxury; it is how they earn a living, and fuel is built into the cost of almost everything. Somebody grew the food, somebody processed it, somebody put it on a truck and somebody drove that truck to the store. Every step costs money, and fuel is part of that cost. Reasoning · 25 wordsWhen we lower the cost of moving goods, we help lower the cost of doing business right across this country. The same goes for construction. Claims · 10 wordsLiberals keep talking in the House about building more homes, Positioning · 9 wordsbut talk is cheap. It does not build homes.Positioning Claims · 52 wordsCanadians do not need another list of projects sitting on paper. They need shovels in the ground. They need homes built. They need mines opened. They need roads, pipelines and infrastructure moving. They need Canadian resources getting to market, and most importantly they need the jobs that come with all of it. Reasoning · 54 wordsA project does not employ a worker because Ottawa announced it. It creates opportunity when somebody actually builds it. That is how we grow this economy. That is how we raise paycheques, Off pointand that is ultimately what affordability is all about. It is not just what Canadians pay; it is also what Canadians earn.Partly on point Claims · 29 wordsCanadians need jobs. They need investment. They need businesses expanding and hiring. They need projects moving from an announcement to a construction site. That is how Canadians get ahead.Off point Reasoning · 20 wordsPeople should keep more of what they earn.Partly on point Small businesses should have room to grow. Workers should receive bigger paycheques. Claims · 67 wordsThat brings me to another major economic challenge facing Canadian workers and businesses, the trade war with the United States. Tariffs raise costs. There is no question about that. Trading tariffs back and forth does not make groceries cheaper or businesses more competitive. The Prime Minister has spent considerable time pursuing new economic relationships in Europe, ⁴but Europe is not going to simply replace the United States. Reasoning · 5 wordsLook at our auto sector. Claims · 86 wordsStatistics Canada reported that more than 93% of our motor vehicle exports go south of the border.¹ That is the reality that Canadian auto workers are facing. We can pursue opportunities in Europe. We can diversify our trade somewhat. We can sell more Canadian products around the world, but European customers are not going to replace the 1.5 million Canadian vehicles sold annually to the U.S.A.¹⁷ Our auto industry was built around an integrated North American market.⁷ Right now, that market is being disrupted by tariffs.⁸ The ask · 28 wordsThe Prime Minister has to get to work. He has to get the trade war resolved. He has to get the tariffs off Canadian workers and Canadian businesses. Claims · 61 wordsCanadian auto workers cannot afford to wait while their largest export market becomes more expensive to access. Canadian manufacturers cannot plan investments when they do not know what the rules will be six months from now, and Canadian businesses cannot simply be told to find another market and move on. The United States is our largest trading partner.² That relationship matters. The ask · 27 wordsThe Prime Minister needs to get back to work here at home, get back to the table with the United States and get this trade war resolved. Claims · 21 wordsThat is what he promised in the last election.³ Canadian workers need results.Off point The government claims it is serious about affordability, ¹⁶Reasoning · 16 wordsso it should be looking at every opportunity to lower costs and strengthen the Canadian economy.Partly on point The ask · 38 wordsLower the cost of fuel. Get our products to market. Remove the barriers to building homes. Cut unnecessary red tape. Create the conditions for businesses to invest, expand and hire. Protect Canada’s access to its largest trading partner.Off point Positioning · 20 wordsThe Liberal government cannot tax Canadians into prosperity, try as it might, Partly on pointand it cannot replace economic results with announcements.Positioning Claims · 12 wordsInternational meetings have their place, and new trade relationships have their place, Reasoning · 38 wordsbut Canadians should be able to look at what their government is doing and see those efforts producing results here at home: more jobs, more investment, more homes, more projects getting built and paycheques that actually go further.Off point Claims · 45 wordsCanadians are doing their part: the single mother driving to work every morning, the tradesman loading his truck before sunrise, the farmer putting fuel in his equipment, the trucker moving Canadian goods across this enormous country, and the small business owner trying to make payroll. Reasoning · 14 wordsThose are the people we should be thinking about when we debate the bill. Claims · 8 wordsThey benefit from paying less tax on fuel. Procedure · 4 wordsThe question is straightforward.Procedure The question · 29 wordsIf extending the relief through January helps Canadians, why not give them a few more months? Why not extend broader fuel tax relief until at least Canada Day 2027? The ask · 25 wordsGive Canadian families more time with lower fuel costs. Give farmers and truckers more breathing room. Give small businesses more time with lower operating costs.

At a glance

Lost points for
Echo ×4“Conservatives are calling for all federal taxes on gas and diesel to be removed until at least Canada Day 2027.” Said 4 times by 4 members.Every time it was said

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 92

8 of 72 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I rise today to speak to this act to amend the Excise Tax Act and extend the federal fuel excise tax relief.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “At its core, the legislation would do something very simple.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
A story that illustrates instead of making a point.What the tags mean “I think about the farmer, the trucker, the contractor or the small business owner.”An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “but talk is cheap.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “It does not build homes.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “The Liberal government cannot tax Canadians into prosperity, try as it might,”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “and it cannot replace economic results with announcements.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “The question is straightforward.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 50

64 of 72 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Liberals keep talking in the House about building more homes,”About the Liberals’ home-building talk, not the fuel excise tax relief the bill proposes.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “but talk is cheap.”A remark on rhetoric about housing, not the bill’s fuel tax measures.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “It does not build homes.”About housing announcements, not the fuel tax relief under debate.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadians do not need another list of projects sitting on paper.”About project announcements rather than the bill’s fuel tax provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They need shovels in the ground.”About home construction, not the excise tax suspension the bill would extend.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They need homes built.”About home building, a subject the bill does not touch.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They need mines opened.”About opening mines, unrelated to the bill’s fuel tax measures.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They need roads, pipelines and infrastructure moving.”About infrastructure and pipelines, not the fuel excise tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They need Canadian resources getting to market,”About resource market access, a subject outside the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “and most importantly they need the jobs that come with all of it.”About jobs from projects generally, not the bill’s fuel tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “A project does not employ a worker because Ottawa announced it.”About project announcements and employment generally, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “It creates opportunity when somebody actually builds it.”About economic opportunity generally, not the fuel tax measures.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “That is how we grow this economy.”About economic growth broadly, not the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “That is how we raise paycheques,”About raising paycheques generally, not the fuel tax relief.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “and that is ultimately what affordability is all about.”Touches affordability generally, but does not address the bill’s fuel tax suspension or rates.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “It is not just what Canadians pay;”About earnings as well as costs, not the bill’s fuel tax measures themselves.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “it is also what Canadians earn.”About what Canadians earn, not the fuel excise tax relief the bill proposes.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadians need jobs.”About jobs generally, a subject the bill does not address.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They need investment.”About investment generally, not the bill’s fuel tax provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They need businesses expanding and hiring.”About business expansion and hiring, outside the bill’s subject.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They need projects moving from an announcement to a construction site.”About moving projects to construction, not the fuel excise tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “That is how Canadians get ahead.”About getting ahead economically generally, not the bill’s measures.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “People should keep more of what they earn.”Touches keeping more of what one earns, but not the bill’s specific fuel tax extension.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Small businesses should have room to grow.”About small business growth generally, not the bill’s fuel tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Workers should receive bigger paycheques.”About paycheques generally, not the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “That brings me to another major economic challenge facing Canadian workers and businesses, the trade war with the United States.”Shifts to the trade war with the United States, a subject the bill does not touch.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Tariffs raise costs.”About tariffs, not the fuel excise tax relief under debate.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “There is no question about that.”About tariffs, unrelated to the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Trading tariffs back and forth does not make groceries cheaper or businesses more competitive.”About tariff trade and costs, not the bill’s fuel tax measures.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “The Prime Minister has spent considerable time pursuing new economic relationships in Europe,”About the Prime Minister’s trade diplomacy, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “but Europe is not going to simply replace the United States.”About European trade relations, outside the bill’s subject.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Look at our auto sector.”About the auto sector, not the fuel tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Statistics Canada reported that more than 93% of our motor vehicle exports go south of the border.”A statistic on vehicle exports, unrelated to the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “That is the reality that Canadian auto workers are facing.”About auto workers and exports, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “We can pursue opportunities in Europe.”About trade diversification, not the fuel excise tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “We can diversify our trade somewhat.”About trade diversification, outside the bill’s subject.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “We can sell more Canadian products around the world,”About selling Canadian products abroad, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “but European customers are not going to replace the 1.5 million Canadian vehicles sold annually to the U.S.A.”About vehicle sales to the U.S., unrelated to the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Our auto industry was built around an integrated North American market.”About the North American auto market, not the fuel tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Right now, that market is being disrupted by tariffs.”About tariff disruption of trade, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “The Prime Minister has to get to work.”A demand about trade action, not the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “He has to get the trade war resolved.”About resolving the trade war, a subject the bill does not touch.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “He has to get the tariffs off Canadian workers and Canadian businesses.”About removing tariffs, not the fuel excise tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadian auto workers cannot afford to wait while their largest export market becomes more expensive to access.”About auto workers and export markets, outside the bill’s subject.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadian manufacturers cannot plan investments when they do not know what the rules will be six months from now,”About manufacturer investment uncertainty from tariffs, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “and Canadian businesses cannot simply be told to find another market and move on.”About businesses and markets in the trade context, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “The United States is our largest trading partner.”About the U.S. trading relationship, not the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “That relationship matters.”About the trade relationship generally, not the fuel tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “The Prime Minister needs to get back to work here at home, get back to the table with the United States and get this trade war resolved.”A demand to resolve the trade war, unrelated to the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “That is what he promised in the last election.”About an election promise on trade, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadian workers need results.”About results for workers generally, not the bill’s measures.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “The government claims it is serious about affordability,”About the government’s claimed affordability seriousness generally, not the bill’s specific provisions.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “so it should be looking at every opportunity to lower costs and strengthen the Canadian economy.”A general call to lower costs and strengthen the economy, not the bill’s fuel tax measures themselves.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Get our products to market.”About getting products to market, not the bill’s fuel tax provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Remove the barriers to building homes.”About barriers to home building, outside the bill’s subject.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Cut unnecessary red tape.”About red tape generally, not the bill’s fuel tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Create the conditions for businesses to invest, expand and hire.”About business investment conditions generally, not the bill.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Protect Canada’s access to its largest trading partner.”About trade access, a subject the bill does not touch.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “The Liberal government cannot tax Canadians into prosperity, try as it might,”A general claim about taxing and prosperity, not the bill’s specific fuel tax measures.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “and it cannot replace economic results with announcements.”A general claim about announcements versus results, not the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “International meetings have their place,”About international meetings, not the bill’s fuel tax relief.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “and new trade relationships have their place,”About trade relationships, outside the bill’s subject.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “but Canadians should be able to look at what their government is doing and see those efforts producing results here at home:”About government results generally, not the bill’s provisions.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “more jobs, more investment, more homes, more projects getting built and paycheques that actually go further.”A general list of economic outcomes, not the bill’s fuel tax measures.

Respect · 100

0 of 72 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 72 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Echo · 1 repeated line

Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.

“Conservatives are calling for all federal taxes on gas and diesel to be removed until at least Canada Day 2027.”Said 4 times by 4 members.Every time it was said

Claims · 17

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Statistics Canada reported that more than 93% of our motor vehicle exports go south of the border.”According to Statistics Canada, more than 93% of Canada’s motor vehicle exports are destined for the United States.search
2“The United States is our largest trading partner.”The United States is Canada’s largest trading partner.search
3“That is what he promised in the last election.”The Prime Minister made a promise during the last election.search
4“The Prime Minister has spent considerable time pursuing new economic relationships in Europe,”The Prime Minister has dedicated time to pursuing new economic relationships in Europe.search
5“Conservatives under Prime Minister Harper cut the GST from 7% to 5%,”Conservatives under Prime Minister Harper reduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST) from 7% to 5%.search
6“and that relief stayed.”The GST relief implemented by Conservatives under Prime Minister Harper remained in effect.search
7“Our auto industry was built around an integrated North American market.”Canada’s auto industry was historically developed based on an integrated North American market.search
8“Right now, that market is being disrupted by tariffs.”The integrated North American market is currently experiencing disruption due to tariffs.search
9“It would extend the suspension of the federal excise tax on gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel until January 31, 2027.”The proposed legislation extends the suspension of the federal excise tax on gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuel until January 31, 2027.search
10“On February 1, the government would bring it back at half the regular rate,”The government would reinstate the fuel excise tax at half the regular rate starting on February 1.search
11“and on April 1, the regular excise tax rates would return.”The regular excise tax rates on fuel are scheduled to resume on April 1.search
12“Under the bill, the current suspension would continue through January,”The current suspension of the federal excise tax would continue throughout January under the bill.search
13“and beginning February 1 the federal excise tax on gasoline would come back at five cents per litre.”Beginning February 1, the federal excise tax on gasoline would return at five cents per litre.search
14“Diesel and aviation fuel would come back at two cents per litre.”Diesel and aviation fuel would return to a federal excise tax rate of two cents per litre.search
15“Conservatives are proposing to extend broader federal fuel tax relief until at least Canada Day 2027,”Conservatives are proposing that federal fuel tax relief be extended until at least Canada Day 2027.search
16“The government claims it is serious about affordability,”The government claims to be serious about affordability.search
17“but European customers are not going to replace the 1.5 million Canadian vehicles sold annually to the U.S.A.”European customers will not replace the 1.5 million Canadian vehicles sold annually to the United States.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20