“Mr. Speaker, the member talked about the automotive sector in Canada being built on the concept of integration between Canada and the United States. I do not think there is anybody in the House who would disagree with that, but what I want to hear from the member is what his proposed solution is to this. Integration depends on both countries being interested in trade. What we have seen since the new administration has come along is that the United States is moving away from that. It is no longer interested in the integration the member talks about. He can stand here and say until he is blue in the face that the Prime Minister needs to get back to work, but the reality of the situation is that if one side is no longer interested in that integration, there is really not much one can do other than to provide supports for workers and look for new opportunities. Can the member explain what he means by “get back to work”, when the objective is clear?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 30 wordsclearly the United States is our biggest trading partner.1The Prime Minister ran a whole campaign saying he was the person who would get a deal with the United States.2The question · 15 wordsWhere is it?Why not get back to the table with our largest trading partner?Reasoning · 7 wordsTariffs upon tariffs do not benefit Canadians.The ask · 25 wordsWe have to get back to the table.We have to get a tariff-free deal with the United States of America, our biggest trading partner.Reasoning · 24 wordsWe just cannot sit back and say we are going to replace that market with the European market.It does not work that way.
