← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 68. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance. 30 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
71 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 11% Claims 77% Positioning 12%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 8
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 10 words let us see what the Conservatives from Saskatchewan voted against. Procedure Claims · 71 words The Canada child benefit they voted against.1 The national school food program they voted against.2 The Canada disability benefit they voted against.3 The Canada groceries and essentials benefit they voted against.4 The Canada workers benefit they voted against.5 The Canadian dental care plan they voted against.6 The old age security program they voted against.7 Canada student loans and grants they voted against.8 Record starts in housing in Saskatchewan they voted against. Positioning · 11 words You guys have to learn how to do your job better. Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×10 Procedure Positioning Didn't answer None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 71
2 of 12 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “let us see what the Conservatives from Saskatchewan voted against.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “You guys have to learn how to do your job better.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 0
10 of 12 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Canada child benefit they voted against.” It lists a vote against the child benefit, not the gas tax or the plan the question asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The national school food program they voted against.” It lists a vote against the school food program, not the measures the question asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Canada disability benefit they voted against.” It lists a vote against the disability benefit, not the measures the question asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Canada groceries and essentials benefit they voted against.” It lists a vote against the groceries benefit, not the measures the question asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Canada workers benefit they voted against.” It lists a vote against the workers benefit, not the measures the question asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Canadian dental care plan they voted against.” It lists a vote against the dental care plan, not the measures the question asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The old age security program they voted against.” It lists a vote against old age security, not the measures the question asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canada student loans and grants they voted against.” It lists a vote on student loans and grants, not the measures the question asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Record starts in housing in Saskatchewan they voted against.” It cites housing starts in Saskatchewan, not the gas tax, fuel costs or the plan asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “You guys have to learn how to do your job better.” It is a remark about the Conservatives’ performance, not the affordability question asked.
Respect · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 8
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “The Canada child benefit they voted against” Conservative MPs from Saskatchewan voted against the Canada child benefit. search 2 “The national school food program they voted against” Conservative MPs from Saskatchewan voted against the national school food program. search 3 “The Canada disability benefit they voted against” Conservative MPs from Saskatchewan voted against the Canada disability benefit. search 4 “The Canada groceries and essentials benefit they voted against” Conservative MPs from Saskatchewan voted against the Canada groceries and essentials benefit. search 5 “The Canada workers benefit they voted against” Conservative MPs from Saskatchewan voted against the Canada workers benefit. search 6 “The Canadian dental care plan they voted against” Conservative MPs from Saskatchewan voted against the Canadian dental care plan. search 7 “old age security program they voted against” Conservative MPs from Saskatchewan voted against the old age security program. search 8 “Canada student loans and grants they voted against” Conservative MPs from Saskatchewan voted against Canada student loans and grants. search
