← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 93 / 100
Signal
80 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 46% Anecdote 15% Reasoning 16% The question 23%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 44 words last week, Surrey families received two disturbing police warnings.1 High-risk offender Skylar Pelletier, with a history of violent and sexual offences, was released into our community.2 The very next day Jonathon Muzychka, another high-risk offender with a history of violence, was released into Surrey.3 Anecdote · 14 words We grandmothers are terrified watching our grandchildren walk to the park or to school. Anecdote Reasoning · 15 words We should not have to worry about dangerous offenders being let out into our city. The question · 22 words I am begging on their behalf. When will the Liberals end their dangerous catch-and-release policies and put families first, before repeat offenders?
Signal · 80
1 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “We grandmothers are terrified watching our grandchildren walk to the park or to school.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “last week, Surrey families received two disturbing police warnings” In the week before September 22, 2026, Surrey residents received two police warnings. search 2 “High-risk offender Skylar Pelletier, with a history of violent and sexual offences, was released into our community” A high-risk offender named Skylar Pelletier, with a history of violent and sexual offences, was released into Surrey around mid-September 2026. search 3 “The very next day Jonathon Muzychka, another high-risk offender with a history of violence, was released into Surrey” A high-risk offender named Jonathon Muzychka, with a history of violence, was released into Surrey the day after Pelletier’s release. search
