← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: it is about the House's rules and business, not a case to grade. Not graded
Signal
39 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 60% Claims 40%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 words I rise on a point of order. Procedure Claims · 17 words Today during question period, I referenced a letter from Margaret Haddon, a resident of Bradford West Gwillimbury.1 Procedure · 18 words I am seeking unanimous consent to table this document.2 The Prime Minister and MPs across the way have— Procedure Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure ×3
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 39
3 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I rise on a point of order.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I am seeking unanimous consent to table this document.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The Prime Minister and MPs across the way have—” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Today during question period, I referenced a letter from Margaret Haddon” During question period on September 22, 2026, Scot Davidson referenced a letter from Margaret Haddon, a resident of Bradford West Gwillimbury. search 2 “I am seeking unanimous consent to table this document” On September 22, 2026, Scot Davidson sought unanimous consent to table a letter from Margaret Haddon. search
