Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Carlos Leitão

110 words · 4 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Tamara Kronis (Conservative)
“Madam Speaker, one of the things the member said in his remarks was that the problem is not a short-term problem and that he could see the government having to extend this again depending on the circumstances. Given the value that stability has to food prices in particular, why is the government not considering our recommendation that it should be extended right now permanently for the foreseeable future?”
Statement grade
A+
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 75%Reasoning 15%Promise 9%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 33 wordsindeed, as I pointed out, which is recommended by independent agencies like the World Bank and the IMF, governments should resist the temptation to put in place permanent measures that may distort markets.1 Reasoning · 17 wordsIn a period of need, as is the case now, we should put in place temporary measures. Claims · 50 wordsI do not know what will be happening in January. We do not know if the war will still be going on in the Strait of Hormuz and if crude oil prices will remain above $100, but at some point, the oil market will return to a more stable level, Promise · 10 wordsand at that time, the temporary measures will be removed.

Analysed on