Don Davies

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 12 wordsI rise to speak to Bill C-38, the Canadian fuel affordability act, ProcedureClaims · 16 wordswhich would temporarily extend the government’s fuel tax suspension at a further cost of $2.9 billion.¹ Positioning · 24 wordsNo party in the House has raised greater concern about the affordability crisis facing working Canadians and their families than the New Democrat Party.Positioning Claims · 16 wordsWe know how expensive life has become with the sky-high costs of groceries, fuel and housing, Reasoning · 9 wordsand we know that Canadians need effective relief now. Claims · 81 wordsUnfortunately, the policy contained in this bill, which would ultimately cost over $5 billion, has failed to deliver the lower fuel prices Canadians were promised.² When this tax suspension was first implemented last April, New Democrats warned that its impact on prices at the pump would be limited because nothing in the legislation guaranteed that savings would actually reach consumers.³ We argued then that there was nothing to stop oil companies from absorbing some or all of the tax cuts themselves. Reasoning · 3 wordsWe were right. Claims · 130 wordsCanadians are now paying more for gasoline today than they did in April, and substantially more than they were paying before the latest global energy crisis began. On the day the tax suspension took effect, the national average price of gasoline was $1.69 per litre.⁴ Today it stands at $1.83 per litre.⁵ It is also more than 60¢ per litre higher than it was last Christmas, before the U.S.-Israeli invasion of Iran sent oil markets into turmoil.⁶ The government has essentially given billions of taxpayer dollars directly to the oil companies, some of the most profitable corporations on the planet. While Canadians struggle with the cost of living, oil and gas giants are poised to collect $90 billion in profits this year alone, not because of innovation or increased productivity, ⁷Reasoning · 6 wordsbut because they are gouging consumers. Claims · 50 wordsThat is why New Democrats have opposed this policy from the outset, and why we continue to advocate for the future a better, more effective way to help struggling consumers, Vague promisewhich is a windfall profits tax on oil and gas companies with the proceeds returned to Canadians who need relief. Reasoning · 6 wordsThis is not a radical idea. Claims · 31 wordsWe have done it before in times of crisis. Canada imposed excess profits taxes during both world wars.⁸ The Liberals themselves imposed an excess profits tax on banks during the pandemic.⁹ Reasoning · 76 wordsIt is an approach that makes sense. A windfall profits tax avoids the pitfalls we have just seen from the flawed policy contained in this legislation. It cannot be captured as corporate profits. It allows support to be targeted to those who need it the most. It does not encourage greater fossil fuel consumption at a time when the world is facing a climate emergency. The irony of this fuel tax suspension is hard to ignore. Claims · 38 wordsCanadians who have chosen to reduce their emissions by purchasing electric vehicles, taking public transit, cycling or making other environmentally responsible choices are being forced to pay for another fossil fuel subsidy while receiving none of the benefits. Reasoning · 59 wordsWe cannot ignore the opportunity cost of delaying our transition to the sustainable energy sources of the future. Every dollar spent propping up an industry that is already enormously profitable is a dollar not invested in the technologies that could lower energy costs, strengthen our economy and free Canadians from the endless roller coaster of oil and gas prices. Claims · 128 wordsThe world is changing far faster than many people realize. In the early 2020s, we crossed an important threshold. For the first time, solar power became cheaper than fossil fuels and cheaper than coal, making it the lowest cost source of electricity available.¹⁰ Wind power followed closely behind as the second cheapest source.¹¹ By 2024, over 92% of all new electricity generation added globally came from renewable sources.¹² Solar power is now being installed at a staggering pace around the world, with more than a gigawatt of capacity being added every single day.¹³ That is equivalent to the output of a large, coal-fired power plant or a nuclear reactor. The world now possesses the manufacturing capacity to produce as many solar panels as climate scientists say we need. Reasoning · 34 wordsThe old arguments that clean energy is too expensive, too unreliable or incapable of meeting our energy needs simply do not withstand scrutiny. The global energy transition is no longer a question of possibility. Claims · 90 wordsIt is already under way. While the Liberal government spends billions subsidizing fossil fuels, other countries, from Europe to China, are investing in the industries that will create the jobs, exports, productivity gains and economic opportunities of the future. This transformation is not limited to only wealthy countries. According to the Rocky Mountain Institute, renewable energy capacity is growing twice as fast in countries of the global south as it is in developed countries.¹⁴ Communities that have historically lacked reliable access to energy are increasingly leapfrogging directly to clean electricity.Partly on point Reasoning · 55 wordsThese examples matter because they show that the transition is about far more than reducing emissions. It is about freedom, freedom from volatile energy prices, freedom from domination by oil and gas monopolies and freedom from the dangerous geopolitics that have always accompanied fossil fuels, where access to energy can be manipulated, restricted and weaponized. Claims · 150 wordsWe can see the consequences of that reality unfolding right now in Cuba. For more than 60 years, Cuba has lived under an illegal U.S. economic blockade that has been repeatedly condemned by the overwhelming majority of countries at the United Nations.¹⁵ Today, that pressure is intensified into an American effort to choke off Cuba’s energy supply altogether.Hidden agency When fuel is cut off, hospitals struggle to operate, water systems fail, food spoils and ordinary people suffer. Let us be clear, this is not an unintended consequence. Humanitarian catastrophe is the objective. Canada has a long tradition of pursuing an independent relationship with Cuba. We have maintained diplomatic relations since 1945, consistently opposed the U.S. economic blockade and built deep cultural and commercial ties between our peoples, ¹⁶yet, as humanitarian conditions worsen and the Trump administration cruelly and illegally blockades Cuba’s fuel supplies, the Liberal government has refused to speak out. Reasoning · 19 wordsThat silence is difficult to reconcile with the principles articulated by the Prime Minister in his speech in Davos. Claims · 49 wordsThere, he argued that middle powers like Canada have a responsibility to defend sovereignty, human rights and solidarity rather than bowing to the exercise of power by stronger states. He cautioned against the temptation to “go along to get along” in the face of coercion and intimidation from superpowers.¹⁷ Reasoning · 18 wordsThose are admirable principles, but if they mean anything, they must apply to Canada and Cuba as well. The ask · 56 wordsCanada should speak out strongly and demand that Donald Trump rescind his illegal blockade. We should stand with the Cuban people by providing immediate energy support to keep essential services running while helping the country rapidly build the renewable energy capacity needed to free itself from imported fossil fuels and the threat of future energy blockades.Off point Procedure · 8 wordsThis is ultimately the lesson before us today.Procedure Reasoning · 48 wordsInvestments in clean energy are not simply climate policy. They are affordable policy. They are industrial policy. They are security policy. They are investments in a future where communities are less vulnerable to geopolitical conflict, less dependent on scarce resources and more capable of determining their own destiny. Claims · 11 wordsThe technology exists. The costs have fallen. The solutions are available, The ask · 31 wordsso let us stop the destructive and senseless expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure and consumption on a planet crying out for relief. Let us stop subsidizing the oil and gas industry, Claims · 8 wordswhich does not need the money. Canadians do. The ask · 24 wordsLet us start investing in the energy supplies of the future that will lower costs, create jobs, build our economy and protect our planet. Promise · 38 wordsCanadians can count on New Democrats to support positive and constructive policies in this place that will actually help them with the affordability crisis they are facing.Vague promise We will continue to oppose corporate giveaways by the Liberal government, Vague promiseClaims · 16 wordswhich are supported by the Conservative Party, that simply enrich corporations while Canadians struggle every day.