Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Jagsharan Singh Mahal

106 words · 4 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, the member has been interesting. What the Government of Canada has done is taken more of a holistic approach in dealing with affordability, because it is not new. It is something the Prime Minister has made a commitment to since the last federal election, and even prior to that. He has been Prime Minister for 18 months, and there have been a number of different measures. We can talk about getting rid of the carbon tax. We can talk about the income tax break for over 20 million Canadians. Today it is the excise tax on gas, which is important legislation. I am glad the Conservatives are going to support it. What about other initiatives that are also helping out with the issue of affordability, such as the dental program, the pharmacare program and the national food program in our schools? Does the member support the whole package?”
Statement grade
B
76 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 12%The ask 61%Claims 10%Reasoning 16%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 13 wordsas I said in my speech, Conservatives welcome anything that saves Canadians money.Procedure The ask · 36 wordsHowever, when the measure is a half-measure, not a full-fledged plan, then we must ask the government to do what is needed so that Canadians can keep more in their pockets and have an affordable life. Claims · 11 wordsThe government is proposing to cut these taxes only until April.1 The ask · 29 wordsWe are asking for relief to be given until Canada Day 2027, and to also get rid of the fuel standard tax as well as the industrial carbon tax, Reasoning · 17 wordswhich are driving up the cost of fuel and which drive up the cost of everyday living.Partly on point

Analysed on