“Mr. Speaker, I am perplexed by the answer that my hon. colleague gave, two questions ago, to my colleague from Quebec, when she had said that she would always support affordability measures but not all of them. She is happy to support this one. I would like to congratulate her for supporting this piece of legislation going to committee. When else has she supported affordability measures? I am thinking of the tax cuts for 22 million Canadians. She did not support that then. When it came to providing seniors with a dental care program, she did not support that. When it came to helping our young kids to be able to have access to good food so that they could learn in school, she did not support that either. I think that this is the first time that she is supporting an affordability measure. I wonder if the hon. member would like to comment on why is it that this is now the first time that she is doing it, although I should not look a gift horse in the mouth. I am quite happy that she is supporting this going to second reading.”
Statement grade
F
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 67. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance.
30 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Aside 28%Claims 30%Reasoning 42%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Aside · 16 wordsI am so glad the member is looking a gift horse in the mouth so readily.AsidePartly on pointClaims · 17 wordsThe Liberals have a deficit of nearly $100 billion.1It is one of the highest deficits ever.Reasoning · 24 wordsIt is my children and the children of Canadians right now who are going to suffer when they try to pay back that deficit.Off point
