Replying to Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, in his speech, my colleague shared stories of constituents in his riding having to do with the cost of living. What does he tell people when they ask him, “Why did you vote against a tax cut that could help me if I am in the middle class? Why did you vote against the national school food program for my school-aged children? Why did you vote against affordable child care services for my children? Why did you vote against suspending the one-week waiting period for employment insurance?” When he tells us these stories, I wish I had the full picture. How does my colleague justify these votes to the constituents who come to see him to talk about the cost of living?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 43%Promise 57%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 27 wordsthe stories I hear from my riding are these: “Keep fighting for me.1Keep trying to lower taxes.2Keep the Liberal government accountable.3We trust in you, 4Promise · 36 wordsand we know that you are going to go to Parliament to fight for us”, just as I am fighting today to cut all the fuel tax for Canadians to put money back in their pocket.56
