Procedure 2% Claims 43% Aside 4% Positioning 35% Reasoning 11% The ask 6%
Structure · 40 steps
Claims · 15
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 29 words I am pleased to rise on behalf of my hard-driving constituents in the expansive riding of Algonquin—Renfrew—Pembroke to speak to Bill C-38, an act to amend the Excise Tax. Procedure Claims · 17 words Yesterday, the finance minister told the House that the Liberals would take no lessons from the Conservatives.1 Aside · 12 words Today, class is in session, and the lesson plan is lower taxes. Aside Claims · 10 words Conservatives have been calling for gas tax relief for months, Positioning · 6 words while Liberals enjoyed vacations in Tuscany. Positioning Off point Claims · 48 words They left the decision to extend the gas tax holiday until the last minute in an effort to maximize uncertainty. The Liberal decision to end this tax break in the middle of winter is perplexing. The Prime Minister has claimed he speaks to the United States President regularly. Positioning · 18 words Does the Prime Minister have secret knowledge about when the conflict over the Strait of Hormuz will end? Positioning Off point Reasoning · 39 words Based on the legislation before us, it appears the Liberals think the oil shipments through the strait will be at 50% of pre-war levels by January 31, and the entire strait will be open by the end of March. Positioning · 73 words Of course, the Liberals have no idea when the conflict will end. The government wants to provide as little relief as it can get away with. Hiking the tax by 50% on February 1 is its way of boiling the frog slowly. It takes a certain level of Liberal arrogance to call a bill that schedules tax hikes the Canadian fuel affordability act. This is all part of a plan with the Liberals. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 9 words They call the bill, which would hike taxes, affordability. Positioning · 5 words They call inflationary spending affordability. Positioning Claims · 68 words They call doubling the deficit fiscally responsible. Despite their elbows up rhetoric, the Prime Minister is adopting the exact same form of state-led capitalism we see coming from the White House. The fact that the Prime Minister copied the U.S. President’s plan to launch a sovereign debt fund is very telling about how both view the economy. The U.S. President has often compared himself to a mall manager, Positioning · 9 words while the Prime Minister acts like a bank manager. Positioning Reasoning · 15 words Neither of them should be so intimately involved in the operations of any particular business. Claims · 40 words This is exactly why Norway’s actual sovereign wealth fund does not invest in Norway.2 It is the exact opposite of the sovereign debt funds in Canada and the United States. These debt funds are specifically designed to pick domestic companies. Reasoning · 19 words The temptation to politically interfere in the operations of companies or on behalf of the companies is too great. Claims · 180 words We have too many examples of this already happening in Canada, even without the sovereign debt fund. The company formerly known as SNC-Lavalin is a perfect example. The last prime minister tried to bully his justice minister into letting SNC off the hook for bribery and corruption.3 When that did not work, he fired her.4 Then he replaced her with a man whom the current Prime Minister made our UN ambassador.5 Now SNC has a new name and new business partners who together have formed the consortium Cadence.6 When the Liberals released a request for proposals to build Via’s high-frequency rail system, Cadence submitted a proposal that called on the Liberals to scrap this popular plan and replace it with a much more expensive high-speed rail line.7 One of the partners in the consortium is the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, whose former president just so happened to be the Clerk of the Privy Council.8 Together they cooked up a secret plan to privatize the most profitable parts of Via while taxpayers pay for the rest of Via. Off point The ask · 24 words If the Liberals are going to hike taxes, the least they could do is not actively make every alternative form of transportation more expensive, Partly on point Claims · 54 words yet that is the plan they cooked up with their billionaire buddies last week, to privatize our airports and to privatize Via Rail.9 Off point Now, their first bill back proposes to hike the gas tax in the middle of winter. To defend these choices, the Liberals have already started to point to examples of Europe. Positioning · 62 words The Liberals want Europe’s private airports without its robust airline competition. They want a French company to build their high-speed rail, without France’s transparency laws. Off point They want European levels of gas taxation to force us all into Chinese cars running on an electric grid powered by Brookfield. Partly on point What the Prime Minister really wants is to partner with Europe to impose carbon tariffs. Positioning Claims · 47 words The legacy media may have memory-holed the fact that the very first policy the Prime Minister ever proposed when he was just a Liberal leadership candidate 20 months ago was to impose carbon tariffs on Canadians who dared to purchase products from countries without a carbon tax.10 Positioning · 34 words Is it any surprise the carbon tariff Prime Minister appointed the only Liberal MP to acknowledge carbon tariffs are coming as his parliamentary secretary? Off point This is all part of the Liberals’ war on affordability. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 53 words From their ban on plastic food packaging to their inflammatory deficit spending, everything they touch becomes more expensive. When the U.S. President endorsed our Prime Minister, he said it was because they agreed on many things.11 When President Trump attacked our Conservative leader, it was because we did not support the President’s agenda.12 Reasoning · 41 words What the Liberal Prime Minister and the Republican President agree on is that they should be at the centre of every consequential economic decision in the country. They both agree that the government should serve the interests of the investor class. Positioning · 16 words Now the Liberals even have one big, beautiful omnibus bill to make Bay Street great again. Positioning Claims · 41 words Even Liberal-funded reporters are calling this latest move Trumpian. We would think they would have caught on to the similarities when the Prime Minister literally borrowed an oversized novelty page from the U.S. President’s playbook on his first day in office.13 Off point Positioning · 36 words Fortunately for Canadians and Americans, there is still one political party on this continent that actually believes in freedom. As our leader ably demonstrated last week, there is a clear path to long-term sustainable economic growth, Positioning Reasoning · 12 words and that is to empower the free people in a free market. Partly on point Positioning · 179 words The Prime Minister and the U.S. President have a faith-based approach to running a country’s economy. They have the faith that their business acumen is more than enough to pick winners and losers. Off point Conservatives put our faith in the Canadian people. We trust Canadian entrepreneurs to out-innovate and out-compete the world. We trust Canadian consumers to buy the products and services that work best for them. We reject the tired idea that a president, a prime minister or even a king can decide who we can trade our property with. We believe in cutting red tape for all businesses, not just the ones that hire the best Liberal lobbyists. Vague promise We believe in cutting taxes for all businesses, not just for the ones that invest in projects that Liberals find politically acceptable to support. Vague promise Conservatives trust and believe in Canadians because we have confidence born of true patriotic love. Partly on point The Liberals and Republicans have succumbed to the siren song of economic nationalism and protectionism. That is rooted in insecurity. It saps confidence. It breeds corruption. Off point It makes life less affordable. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 45 words Is it really any coincidence that the sectors of our economy protected from foreign competition are the most expensive, such as domestic air travel, cellphone bills, insurance rates and broadband Internet? Off point Canadians can reasonably blame the U.S. President’s actions for the high price of gas, Partly on point Positioning · 37 words but Canadians have only the Liberal Party to blame for the high cost of everything else. Off point While the finance minister can pretend not to copy our policies, he cannot ignore reality for long. Canadians are being squeezed, Positioning Reasoning · 18 words and the Liberal plan to hike the gas tax in the middle of winter is not the solution. Claims · 12 words The Liberals are already raking in GST windfall from higher gas prices. Reasoning · 16 words They do not need to compound the pain with a frosty tax hike on February 1.14 The ask · 21 words Instead of teasing Canadians with temporary tax relief, the Liberals could do the hard work of committing to substantial tax reform. Positioning · 50 words Of course, this would actually force the Prime Minister to spend time in Canada rather than hitting the globalist gala circuit. It is clearly more enjoyable for the Prime Minister to spend all his time in Europe re-reannouncing our partnership strategy for a new future alliance for a strategic future. Positioning Off point The ask · 39 words Instead of introducing a bill to raise gas taxes and calling it a fuel affordability act, maybe the Prime Minister could use some of his international rizz to negotiate an end to the conflict over the Strait of Hormuz. Partly on point Aside · 46 words With any luck, that would earn him a Nobel Peace Prize, which we could trade off for tariff relief, or instead, he could spend his time helping his former colleagues at Brookfield partner with a Crown corporation he controls to launch a new maple-flavoured investment fund. Aside Claims · 32 words Barring any attempt to subvert the fixed elections act, Canadians will get to render a verdict in October 2029 on how they think the Prime Minister has spent his time in office.15 Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×52 Positioning ×37 Partly on point ×17 Aside ×5 Vague promise ×2 Procedure
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 53
43 of 114 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I am pleased to rise on behalf of my hard-driving constituents in the expansive riding of Algonquin—Renfrew—Pembroke to speak to Bill C-38, an act to amend the Excise Tax.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “Today, class is in session,” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “and the lesson plan is lower taxes.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “while Liberals enjoyed vacations in Tuscany.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Does the Prime Minister have secret knowledge about when the conflict over the Strait of Hormuz will end?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Of course, the Liberals have no idea when the conflict will end.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The government wants to provide as little relief as it can get away with.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Hiking the tax by 50% on February 1 is its way of boiling the frog slowly.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It takes a certain level of Liberal arrogance to call a bill that schedules tax hikes the Canadian fuel affordability act.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is all part of a plan with the Liberals.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They call inflationary spending affordability.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “while the Prime Minister acts like a bank manager.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Liberals want Europe’s private airports without its robust airline competition.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They want a French company to build their high-speed rail, without France’s transparency laws.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They want European levels of gas taxation to force us all into Chinese cars running on an electric grid powered by Brookfield.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What the Prime Minister really wants is to partner with Europe to impose carbon tariffs.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Is it any surprise the carbon tariff Prime Minister appointed the only Liberal MP to acknowledge carbon tariffs are coming as his parliamentary secretary?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is all part of the Liberals’ war on affordability.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Now the Liberals even have one big, beautiful omnibus bill to make Bay Street great again.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Fortunately for Canadians and Americans, there is still one political party on this continent that actually believes in freedom.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As our leader ably demonstrated last week, there is a clear path to long-term sustainable economic growth,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Prime Minister and the U.S. President have a faith-based approach to running a country’s economy.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They have the faith that their business acumen is more than enough to pick winners and losers.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Conservatives put our faith in the Canadian people.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We trust Canadian entrepreneurs to out-innovate and out-compete the world.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We trust Canadian consumers to buy the products and services that work best for them.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We reject the tired idea that a president, a prime minister or even a king can decide who we can trade our property with.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We believe in cutting red tape for all businesses, not just the ones that hire the best Liberal lobbyists.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We believe in cutting taxes for all businesses, not just for the ones that invest in projects that Liberals find politically acceptable to support.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Conservatives trust and believe in Canadians because we have confidence born of true patriotic love.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Liberals and Republicans have succumbed to the siren song of economic nationalism and protectionism.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is rooted in insecurity.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It saps confidence.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It breeds corruption.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It makes life less affordable.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but Canadians have only the Liberal Party to blame for the high cost of everything else.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “While the finance minister can pretend not to copy our policies, he cannot ignore reality for long.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Canadians are being squeezed,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Of course, this would actually force the Prime Minister to spend time in Canada rather than hitting the globalist gala circuit.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is clearly more enjoyable for the Prime Minister to spend all his time in Europe re-reannouncing our partnership strategy for a new future alliance for a strategic future.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “With any luck, that would earn him a Nobel Peace Prize,” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “which we could trade off for tariff relief,” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “or instead, he could spend his time helping his former colleagues at Brookfield partner with a Crown corporation he controls to launch a new maple-flavoured investment fund.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 27
69 of 114 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “while Liberals enjoyed vacations in Tuscany.” About where Liberals vacationed, not the fuel tax bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Prime Minister has claimed he speaks to the United States President regularly.” About the Prime Minister’s contact with the U.S. President, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Does the Prime Minister have secret knowledge about when the conflict over the Strait of Hormuz will end?” A rhetorical question about the Strait of Hormuz conflict, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “This is all part of a plan with the Liberals.” About a general Liberal plan, not the bill’s terms.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They call inflationary spending affordability.” About spending called affordability, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They call doubling the deficit fiscally responsible.” About the deficit, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Despite their elbows up rhetoric, the Prime Minister is adopting the exact same form of state-led capitalism we see coming from the White House.” About state-led capitalism and the Prime Minister’s approach, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The fact that the Prime Minister copied the U.S. President’s plan to launch a sovereign debt fund is very telling about how both view the economy.” About a sovereign debt fund, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The U.S. President has often compared himself to a mall manager,” About the U.S. President’s self-description, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “while the Prime Minister acts like a bank manager.” About the Prime Minister as a bank manager, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Neither of them should be so intimately involved in the operations of any particular business.” About leaders running businesses, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is exactly why Norway’s actual sovereign wealth fund does not invest in Norway.” About Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is the exact opposite of the sovereign debt funds in Canada and the United States.” About sovereign debt funds, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “These debt funds are specifically designed to pick domestic companies.” About debt funds picking domestic companies, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The temptation to politically interfere in the operations of companies or on behalf of the companies is too great.” About political interference in companies, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have too many examples of this already happening in Canada, even without the sovereign debt fund.” About alleged interference examples, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The company formerly known as SNC-Lavalin is a perfect example.” About SNC-Lavalin, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The last prime minister tried to bully his justice minister into letting SNC off the hook for bribery and corruption.” About the SNC-Lavalin affair, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “When that did not work, he fired her.” About the SNC-Lavalin affair, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Then he replaced her with a man whom the current Prime Minister made our UN ambassador.” About appointments connected to SNC, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Now SNC has a new name and new business partners who together have formed the consortium Cadence.” About SNC’s renaming and partners, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “When the Liberals released a request for proposals to build Via’s high-frequency rail system, Cadence submitted a proposal that called on the Liberals to scrap this popular plan and replace it with a much more expensive high-speed rail line.” About Via Rail proposals and Cadence, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “One of the partners in the consortium is the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, whose former president just so happened to be the Clerk of the Privy Council.” About the Caisse de dépôt and the Privy Council Clerk, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Together they cooked up a secret plan to privatize the most profitable parts of Via while taxpayers pay for the rest of Via.” About a Via privatization plan, not the fuel tax.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “If the Liberals are going to hike taxes, the least they could do is not actively make every alternative form of transportation more expensive,” Touches the tax hike but is mainly about transportation costs outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “yet that is the plan they cooked up with their billionaire buddies last week, to privatize our airports and to privatize Via Rail.” About privatizing airports and Via Rail, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “To defend these choices, the Liberals have already started to point to examples of Europe.” About Liberals pointing to European examples, not the bill’s terms.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Liberals want Europe’s private airports without its robust airline competition.” About airports and airline competition, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They want a French company to build their high-speed rail, without France’s transparency laws.” About high-speed rail and transparency laws, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “They want European levels of gas taxation to force us all into Chinese cars running on an electric grid powered by Brookfield.” Touches fuel taxation but is mainly about electric vehicles and the power grid.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What the Prime Minister really wants is to partner with Europe to impose carbon tariffs.” About carbon tariffs with Europe, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The legacy media may have memory-holed the fact that the very first policy the Prime Minister ever proposed when he was just a Liberal leadership candidate 20 months ago was to impose carbon tariffs on Canadians who dared to purchase products from countries without a carbon tax.” About the Prime Minister’s past carbon tariff proposal, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Is it any surprise the carbon tariff Prime Minister appointed the only Liberal MP to acknowledge carbon tariffs are coming as his parliamentary secretary?” About a parliamentary secretary appointment and carbon tariffs, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “This is all part of the Liberals’ war on affordability.” A general claim about a war on affordability, not the bill’s measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “From their ban on plastic food packaging to their inflammatory deficit spending, everything they touch becomes more expensive.” About plastics and deficit spending, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “When the U.S. President endorsed our Prime Minister, he said it was because they agreed on many things.” About the U.S. President’s endorsement, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “When President Trump attacked our Conservative leader, it was because we did not support the President’s agenda.” About the U.S. President and the Conservative leader, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What the Liberal Prime Minister and the Republican President agree on is that they should be at the centre of every consequential economic decision in the country.” About the two leaders’ views of economic power, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They both agree that the government should serve the interests of the investor class.” About the investor class, not the fuel tax.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Now the Liberals even have one big, beautiful omnibus bill to make Bay Street great again.” About an omnibus bill and Bay Street, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Even Liberal-funded reporters are calling this latest move Trumpian.” About reporters’ views of a government move, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would think they would have caught on to the similarities when the Prime Minister literally borrowed an oversized novelty page from the U.S. President’s playbook on his first day in office.” About a novelty page borrowed from the U.S. President, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Fortunately for Canadians and Americans, there is still one political party on this continent that actually believes in freedom.” A general claim about believing in freedom, not the bill’s measures.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “As our leader ably demonstrated last week, there is a clear path to long-term sustainable economic growth,” About the Conservative leader’s growth plan, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and that is to empower the free people in a free market.” A general free-market position, not the bill’s terms.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Prime Minister and the U.S. President have a faith-based approach to running a country’s economy.” About the two leaders’ economic faith, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They have the faith that their business acumen is more than enough to pick winners and losers.” About picking winners and losers, not the fuel tax.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Conservatives put our faith in the Canadian people.” A general statement of trust in Canadians, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We trust Canadian entrepreneurs to out-innovate and out-compete the world.” About entrepreneurs generally, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We trust Canadian consumers to buy the products and services that work best for them.” About consumers generally, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We reject the tired idea that a president, a prime minister or even a king can decide who we can trade our property with.” A general trade and property position, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We believe in cutting red tape for all businesses, not just the ones that hire the best Liberal lobbyists.” About red tape generally, not the bill’s measures.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We believe in cutting taxes for all businesses, not just for the ones that invest in projects that Liberals find politically acceptable to support.” About business tax cuts generally, not the fuel excise tax.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Conservatives trust and believe in Canadians because we have confidence born of true patriotic love.” A general statement of patriotic confidence, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Liberals and Republicans have succumbed to the siren song of economic nationalism and protectionism.” About economic nationalism and protectionism, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is rooted in insecurity.” About insecurity as a root of nationalism, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It saps confidence.” About confidence generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It breeds corruption.” About corruption generally, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It makes life less affordable.” A general affordability claim, not the bill’s measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Is it really any coincidence that the sectors of our economy protected from foreign competition are the most expensive, such as domestic air travel, cellphone bills, insurance rates and broadband Internet?” About protected sectors’ prices, not the fuel tax.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Canadians can reasonably blame the U.S. President’s actions for the high price of gas,” About gas prices but attributes them to the U.S. President rather than the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but Canadians have only the Liberal Party to blame for the high cost of everything else.” About the cost of everything else generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Of course, this would actually force the Prime Minister to spend time in Canada rather than hitting the globalist gala circuit.” About the Prime Minister’s travel abroad, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is clearly more enjoyable for the Prime Minister to spend all his time in Europe re-reannouncing our partnership strategy for a new future alliance for a strategic future.” About the Prime Minister’s time in Europe, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Instead of introducing a bill to raise gas taxes and calling it a fuel affordability act, maybe the Prime Minister could use some of his international rizz to negotiate an end to the conflict over the Strait of Hormuz.” Mentions the bill’s tax hike but is mainly a joke about the Strait of Hormuz.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “With any luck, that would earn him a Nobel Peace Prize,” A joke about a Nobel Peace Prize, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which we could trade off for tariff relief,” A joke about trading a prize for tariff relief, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “or instead, he could spend his time helping his former colleagues at Brookfield partner with a Crown corporation he controls to launch a new maple-flavoured investment fund.” About Brookfield and an investment fund, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Barring any attempt to subvert the fixed elections act, Canadians will get to render a verdict in October 2029 on how they think the Prime Minister has spent his time in office.” About the 2029 election verdict, not the bill.
Respect · 100
0 of 114 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 96
2 of 114 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “cutting red tape for all businesses” The statement promises a general policy goal without specifying the scope or method of the action.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “cutting taxes for all businesses” The statement promises a general policy goal without specifying the scope or method of the action.
Claims · 15
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Yesterday, the finance minister told the House that the Liberals would take no lessons from the Conservatives” The finance minister told the House on 2026-09-21 that the Liberals would take no lessons from the Conservatives. search
2 “Norway’s actual sovereign wealth fund does not invest in Norway” Norway’s sovereign wealth fund does not invest in Norway. search
3 “The last prime minister tried to bully his justice minister into letting SNC off the hook for bribery and corruption” Former prime minister Justin Trudeau pressured his justice minister to allow SNC-Lavalin to avoid prosecution for bribery and corruption. search
4 “When that did not work, he fired her” Justin Trudeau removed Jody Wilson-Raybould from her cabinet position after she refused to let SNC off the hook. search
5 “he replaced her with a man whom the current Prime Minister made our UN ambassador” The current Prime Minister appointed Wilson-Raybould’s replacement as justice minister to be Canada’s UN ambassador. search
6 “Now SNC has a new name and new business partners who together have formed the consortium Cadence” SNC-Lavalin was renamed and formed part of the consortium Cadence with new business partners. search
7 “Cadence submitted a proposal that called on the Liberals to scrap this popular plan and replace it with a much more expensive high-speed rail line” In response to the Liberal request for proposals for Via’s high-frequency rail system, Cadence submitted a proposal calling for scrapping that plan and replacing it with high-speed rail. search
8 “the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, whose former president just so happened to be the Clerk of the Privy Council” A former president of the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec became Clerk of the Privy Council. search
9 “that is the plan they cooked up with their billionaire buddies last week, to privatize our airports and to privatize Via Rail” Last week the Liberals announced a plan to privatize Canadian airports and Via Rail. search
10 “the very first policy the Prime Minister ever proposed when he was just a Liberal leadership candidate 20 months ago was to impose carbon tariffs on Canadians” About 20 months before this debate, the current Prime Minister, as a Liberal leadership candidate, first proposed imposing carbon tariffs on Canadians who buy products from countries without a carbon tax. search
11 “When the U.S. President endorsed our Prime Minister, he said it was because they agreed on many things” The U.S. President endorsed Canada’s Prime Minister, saying it was because they agreed on many things. search
12 “President Trump attacked our Conservative leader” President Trump attacked Canada’s Conservative leader. search
13 “the Prime Minister literally borrowed an oversized novelty page from the U.S. President’s playbook on his first day in office” On his first day in office the Prime Minister held up an oversized novelty page, borrowing from the U.S. President’s playbook. search
14 “a frosty tax hike on February 1” Under Bill C-38 the fuel excise tax would rise to 50% above the suspended level on February 1, 2027. search
15 “Canadians will get to render a verdict in October 2029” Canada’s next federal general election is scheduled for October 2029 under the fixed elections act. search