Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Madeleine Chenette

522 words · 26 sentences · 31 clauses

Replying to Cheryl Gallant (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise on behalf of the constituents struggling to make ends meet. I want to begin by congratulating the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance for responding to my question without engaging in personal insults or cheap partisan attacks. This is a significant improvement over his last response, yet he declined to answer the actual question. Still, the response to my question was illuminating. Given the Prime Minister’s central pitch to voters was that he alone could save the Canadian economy, the news that economic growth is near zero is devastating to his brand. Canadians thought they were getting a technocratic central banker. Instead, we got an investment banker using taxpayers’ pensions as leverage to catalyze a growing debt crisis. The parliamentary secretary’s answer reveals the dilemma the Liberals find themselves in. Unlike some of the more fanatical colleagues who describe the economy with unrealistic exuberance, the parliamentary secretary spoke about “signs of progress” and “building foundations”. A shrinking economy destroys the Prime Minister’s brand. A booming economy destroys the justification for deficit spending. An anemic economy is just what the Liberals want. It was Justin Trudeau’s justification for turning Canada back into a deficit country. It is this Prime Minister’s justification for doubling Trudeau’s deficit. Unfortunately, as the Parliamentary Budget Officer made clear in June, there is just a 1% chance Canada’s debt-to-GDP ratio will go down. This public debt is being used for the largest corporate welfare spending spree in Canadian history. This debt binge is happening at the exact same time investors are demanding higher interest rates for government debt. The Liberals want us to ignore the slow growth, the job losses and the debt spiral. At the same time, they accuse us of ignoring the May jobs report. I looked at the jobs report, and it is not as rosy a picture as the Liberals would have us believe. The headline claims 88,000 jobs were created, yet Stats Canada hired 33,000 people to conduct the census in May, and 17,000 of the remaining jobs were in construction, which sounds great until you realize this is Canada, where we build more in the spring and summer and less in the winter. When compared year over year, there has been no job growth in construction. We cannot say the same for retail. In May, 35,000 Canadians lost jobs in the retail sector. In fact, since May 2025, over 61,000 retail jobs have been lost. Despite what the Liberals would have us believe, Donald Trump cannot put a tariff on the mall. The other big sector with job gains was in culture and recreation, because camps, resorts and other seasonal tourist businesses began hiring for the summer season. I know Liberals think they can control the weather with taxes, but they cannot claim credit when the sun shines. For 11 long years, the Liberals have been promising their deficit spending would turbocharge growth and investment. It has not. Recently, the Prime Minister said that they are investing tremendous amounts of money in the country like we have never seen before. Oh, my apologies, that was a quote from President Trump. Here is the Prime Minister’s quote: “We’ve secured new investment in the country of a size not seen, arguably, before.” Well, set aside the hyperbole and the Prime Minister’s narcissism, Canadians can see the truth for themselves. Liberals love low growth. Only Conservatives are fighting for a strong economy.”
Statement grade
A–
Average 87 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 5%Claims 68%Positioning 8%Reasoning 20%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 24 wordsone of the things that I really like about adjournment proceedings is that it does allow us the chance to publicly correct the record.Procedure Claims · 58 wordsConservatives were very quick to say that Canada was in a technical recession.1 We now know that is not the case. In August, Statistics Canada confirmed that the Canadian economy grew at an annualized rate of 3.3% in the second quarter, 2and also revised its Q1 figures to show that the economy grew in those months as well.3 Positioning · 43 wordsIt would be nice if the Conservative Party were as quick to celebrate these achievements as they are to tell us that Canada is broken. However, sticking to the facts does not make for good social media clips or help with fundraising emails.Positioning Claims · 82 wordsThe world is changing rapidly. The U.S. is imposing new tariffs on Canada that are designed to hurt and divide us. At the same time, conflicts in Europe and the Middle East are driving up prices the world over. Despite these challenges, however, Canada continues to show resilience. While the new U.S. tariffs are creating headwinds, the Canadian economy is holding to a position of relative strength. We certainly recognize that some workers, families and small businesses continue to be under pressure. Reasoning · 19 wordsThat is why it is important to look at the facts, as well as the Canadian economy’s overall performance. Claims · 98 wordsCanada’s economic strength is recognized internationally. The International Monetary Fund predicts that Canada will be one of the fastest-growing economies in the G7 this year and next.4 Economic growth rebounded strongly in the second quarter, with real gross domestic product up 3.3%, as I mentioned. Canada had the strongest quarterly growth in the G7 and posted a second consecutive increase in real gross domestic product per capita.56 In addition, our net debt-to-GDP ratio sits at just 10.2%, far below the G7 average of 101.8%.7 In fact, Canada’s net debt burden is far lower than any other G7 nation.8 Reasoning · 17 wordsThese facts show that Canada’s economy is built to withstand global uncertainty and to continue to grow. Claims · 71 wordsThis resilience is a direct result of the targeted measures our government has taken to support Canadians, such as making fuel more affordable for Canadians.Logical leap That is why the government introduced Bill C-38, which extends the temporary suspension of the federal excise tax on gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel until January 31, 2027, after which 50% of the usual excise tax rate will apply from February 1 to March 31, 2027.9 Reasoning · 31 wordsBy reducing fuel and transportation costs, this measure will provide targeted relief to workers, families, farmers and businesses across the country, including in sectors that rely heavily on transportation and construction. Claims · 44 wordsThe government is also taking broader steps to make life more affordable, including through the Canada groceries and essentials benefit, income tax cuts for 22 million Canadians, the cancellation of the consumer carbon tax, 1011and the GST relief for first-time homebuyers of new homes.12 Reasoning · 35 wordsTaken together, these measures will allow Canadians to keep more of their hard-earned money. Each one reflects a consistent principle that our government upholds, specifically that federal support must be timely, targeted and fiscally sustainable.Partly on point

Analysed on