“Mr. Speaker, I appreciated the leader of the official opposition’s speech today. I would like him to comment on the following examples. I have noticed a pattern with the Liberal government and with its predecessor. In 2023, the Liberals established a national supply chain office, because they were all concerned about supply chains. They created the office, and yet we see food inflation being quite high in Canada. It continues to be a concern, especially in my riding. We saw, in 2025, in Bill C-5, that they created a Major Projects Office that is supposed to get big projects built. As we have seen, and as the member has said, zero projects have been built or have been approved by that office. We now have the Minister of Transport creating a national trade corridor office to do the same thing. Does he see a pattern and is this bureaucracy actually helping or hurting?”
Statement grade
B
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 87. The grade is held to 79, 30 above Signal.
79 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 43%Claims 25%Reasoning 24%The ask 8%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 22 wordsthe pattern is that the government confuses the problem with the solution.The problem is the government.It is not the solution.PositioningClaims · 16 wordsThe government inflates food prices with high taxes, inflationary deficits and red tape on farm production.Reasoning · 26 wordsIt then says that the solution to that must be even more government spending and bureaucracy, which drive up the cost of food and everything else.Claims · 16 wordsThe reason we have high housing costs is that government bureaucracy and taxes drive up housing.Reasoning · 19 wordsThe Liberals say that the solution must be even more government programs to fix the problem that they caused.Positioning · 50 wordsIt is like the doctor who administers a poison so that he can administer the antidote and then claim to have saved one’s life.Why did he not just do neither in the first place?The patient would be fine without the government doing the damage in the first place.PositioningClaims · 14 wordsWe have had 11 years of this.1People cannot eat, heat or house themselves.Positioning · 7 wordsWhy do we not try something different?PositioningThe ask · 15 wordsWhy do we not get the government out of the way and off one’s back?
