Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Pierre Poilievre

72 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Michael Coteau (Liberal). The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the bill.
“Mr. Speaker, Bill C-39 is designed to strengthen our economy and to look for ways to build the economy, so that, essentially, it can help everyday Canadians. In my riding of Scarborough—Woburn, I have people coming into my office all the time, talking about the challenges of life. Affordability is a real issue. I want to ask the Leader of the Opposition why, when he was given the opportunity to support programs like the groceries and essentials benefit, which actually puts food on people’s table, the child benefit, dental care, pharmacare and lunch programs for kids, which actually put food in the classroom for kids, when he was given the chance to vote to support everyday Canadians, at every single opportunity, he voted against them.”
Statement grade
F
30 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 12%Claims 49%Reasoning 39%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 9 wordsI think the answer is in the member’s question.Procedure Claims · 35 wordsHe says that his constituents are coming into his office to say how much they are struggling with the cost of living. This is after all of these wonderful programs that they have brought in. Reasoning · 28 wordsMaybe he should listen to his constituents, who are telling him that their empty stomachs, empty fridges and empty bank accounts prove that Liberal programs are not working.Off point

Analysed on