← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 86. The grade is held to 76, 30 above Relevance. 76 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
46 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 6
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 88 words union workers are at the heart of a strong economy. This bill is designed to strengthen good-faith bargaining and achieve better outcomes for everyone. It would crack down on wage theft and the misclassification of jobs.1 It would protect workers during business transactions and insolvencies.2 It would safeguard bargaining rights when contracts change hands.3 It would speed up grievance arbitration, in addition to always upholding the constitutionally protected right to strike.4 5 I just want to reiterate that the right to strike would always be protected under this bill.6 Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×7 Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 7 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 46
7 of 7 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “union workers are at the heart of a strong economy.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “This bill is designed to strengthen good-faith bargaining and achieve better outcomes for everyone.” It describes the bill’s labour measures generally, not section 107 or the member’s thoughts on it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would crack down on wage theft and the misclassification of jobs.” It describes the bill’s labour provisions generally, not section 107 or the member’s thoughts on it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would protect workers during business transactions and insolvencies.” It describes the bill’s labour provisions generally, not section 107 or the member’s thoughts on it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would safeguard bargaining rights when contracts change hands.” It describes the bill’s labour provisions generally, not section 107 or the member’s thoughts on it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would speed up grievance arbitration, in addition to always upholding the constitutionally protected right to strike.” It describes the bill’s labour provisions generally, not section 107 or the member’s thoughts on it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I just want to reiterate that the right to strike would always be protected under this bill.” It restates the bill’s protection of the right to strike, not section 107 or the member’s thoughts on it.
Respect · 100
0 of 7 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 7 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 6
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “crack down on wage theft and the misclassification of jobs” Bill C-39 contains measures targeting wage theft and the misclassification of jobs under the Canada Labour Code. search 2 “protect workers during business transactions and insolvencies” Bill C-39 includes protections for workers during business transactions and insolvencies. search 3 “safeguard bargaining rights when contracts change hands” Bill C-39 safeguards collective bargaining rights when contracts change hands. search 4 “speed up grievance arbitration” Bill C-39 includes measures to speed up grievance arbitration under the Canada Labour Code. search 5 “upholding the constitutionally protected right to strike” Bill C-39 upholds the constitutionally protected right to strike. search 6 “the right to strike would always be protected under this bill” Bill C-39 protects the right to strike. search
