“Mr. Speaker, I am listening to the Liberal member, and the words are great. I can say amen to a lot of what he is saying, but the problem is that the Liberals have been in power for 11 years. He said that Canada has no shortage of opportunities and huge potential. Well, why are things not happening? We have had 500 projects, actually way more than that, bogged down. The Liberals claim that part 1 of the bill sets a one-year decision timeline, but the fine print reveals that the clock only starts after proponents submit every single study requested. Is this not just a shell game that leaves years of regulatory delays untouched?”
Statement grade
C
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 74. The grade is held to 61, 30 above Relevance.
61 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 32%Claims 68%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 31 wordsmaybe this is a bit of a misalignment of ideologies.On this side of the floor, we believe in Canada, we believe in Canadians and we are proud of Canadian businesses.PositioningOff pointClaims · 66 wordsI am amazingly proud of and optimistic about the opportunities we have, especially in Hamilton, being that it is an industrial hub, and the opportunity to realign our economy the way we have to based on the threat we are facing.I know Canadian workers, Canadian businesses and Canadian industry are going to rise to that challenge and be much more economically stable in the future.Partly on point
