Analysis · Debate reply · beta

John-Paul Danko

122 words · 8 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Elizabeth May (Green)
“Mr. Speaker, “getting products to market” is a repeated phrase, and one thing that shakes my confidence in the government was in the Canada Gazette. On August 1, when it posted about the west coast oil pipeline, it did not accurately describe, in a very short description, the product that will go in the pipeline. Similarly, as the Liberals talk about the product going to China in the pipeline, I will note that the diluted bitumen, which is actually the product used mostly in China, is the tar in the bitumen to pave roads. I wonder if the member would comment on the level of familiarity of the government benches with the products that are being shipped.”
Statement grade
B–
71 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 12%Claims 34%Reasoning 54%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 15 wordsthe hon. member is obviously a champion for the environment. We very much respect that.Thanks Claims · 41 wordsMy understanding is that a lot of the Canadian oil and gas being shipped to Asia is being used to make the physical products we use.1 It is not being burned for energy.2 Carbon is not being released into the atmosphere.3 Reasoning · 66 wordsI do agree that we have so much opportunity beyond just the oil and gas industry.Partly on point That is why we are focusing on renewables, on the transition to the electric economy and on doubling the transmission and generation of electricity, 4Vague promisebecause those things are where the real opportunities are in the electric future. There is so much opportunity for those industries in Ontario and in Hamilton.Off point

Analysed on