Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Mark Carney

76 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Pierre Poilievre (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, the other day, the Prime Minister said that his fuel standard tax added zero cost at the pump. Today he claimed that there were no federal taxes. Again, this is the Liberal tradition of telling Canadians that Liberal taxes will make them richer. I have here a study from his own environment department that has the impact of the clean fuel standard on gasoline and diesel prices. It shows that this year it is seven cents, and next year it will be eight cents, then 10¢, then 13¢ and then 17¢ a litre. Why did the Prime Minister mislead the House? Was it to cover up the cost of his tax or because he did not do his homework?”
Statement grade
A–
86 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 62%Reasoning 32%The ask 7%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 39 wordsthe clean fuel standard implications at the end of this decade are lower than all the numbers the member opposite just quoted.1 One thing that the clean fuel standard does do, though, is it raises the price of canola. Reasoning · 24 wordsIf I were a farmer in Battle River—Crowfoot or in Red Deer County, I would like my bushel of canola to get 10% more, Claims · 8 wordswhich is what the clean fuel standard does.2Partly on point The ask · 5 wordsCome join us in support.Off point

Analysed on