Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Anna Gainey

Liberal on The Economy 2026-09-24

93 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Pierre Poilievre (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, when Conservatives hear stories of suffering Canadians, we stand up, and the Prime Minister sits down. He cannot answer to Markita, who cannot pay her bills a year and a half after he promised to make life affordable, but maybe he can answer to Robin. She measures affordability by whether she can afford the three-dollar snack that her children ask for, or whether she has to tell them that this week is rent week. All the spending and promises and programs in the world have not helped her. Will the Prime Minister stand up now, look her in the eye and tell her that affordability is the best it has been in a decade?”

Statement grade

75 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 83%The ask 17%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 77 wordsI think this is a good opportunity to remind members of the House that those across from me voted against the national school food program, ¹which represents a savings of $900 for families with two children in the program.² We have reached 80% of public schools across Canada, in partnership with the provinces and with organizations that are there every day working with kids and working with schools to ensure kids have a healthy start in life.³ The ask · 16 wordsIt would be great if they would get on board with the national school food program.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 45

4 of 4 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “I think this is a good opportunity to remind members of the House that those across from me voted against the national school food program,”About the opposition’s vote against the school food program, not the affordability claim asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “which represents a savings of $900 for families with two children in the program.”Gives savings figures for the school food program rather than answering the affordability question.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We have reached 80% of public schools across Canada, in partnership with the provinces and with organizations that are there every day working with kids and working with schools to ensure kids have a healthy start in life.”Describes the school food program’s reach, not whether affordability is the best in a decade.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “It would be great if they would get on board with the national school food program.”Calls on the opposition to support the program instead of addressing the question put.

Respect · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“voted against the national school food program”Conservative members voted against the national school food program.search
2“a savings of $900 for families with two children in the program”The national school food program represents a savings of $900 for families with two children in the program.search
3“We have reached 80% of public schools across Canada”The national school food program has reached 80% of public schools across Canada.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20