“Madam Speaker, since this is the first time I have had the opportunity to speak to you today, I would like to take the opportunity to say hello and welcome you back to Parliament. Listening to the speech by my colleague from Fort McMurray—Cold Lake, I realize how far apart the Conservatives and the Bloc are on these issues. I thought that Bill C‑39 went beyond everything the Conservatives have wanted for years, but no, it seems that it still falls short, that it still does not go far enough. According to Bill C‑39, assessments will be more flexible, particularly for oil and gas projects, which will no longer be subject to the Impact Assessment Act. It seems to me that the Conservatives should be patting themselves on the back and celebrating, but what I have been hearing all day is the complete opposite. In our opinion, the bill goes so far as to be outrageous. In my colleague’s opinion, what is missing from the bill that would make it acceptable to the Conservatives?”
Statement grade
B+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 84 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 31%Claims 44%Promise 26%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Positioning · 24 wordswe do not trust the Liberals.We are not sure they are actually going to do what they say they are going to do.PositioningClaims · 34 wordsWe voted in favour of Bill C‑5 because they said it was absolutely essential for moving projects forward.1However, we have not seen that.No projects have been started under the Major Projects Office.2Promise · 20 wordsWe want to ensure that this will have a real impact and lead to actual construction projects in our country.Vague promise
