Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Steven MacKinnon

86 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Yves Perron (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, the leader of the House is right. The goal of Bill C-39 is not to lower environmental standards. It is to eliminate them. If a pipeline were to go through Quebec, here is what Bill C-39 sets out for the environmental assessment. The energy regulator in Calgary will be the one to make the final decision. It is made up of seven commissioners, and five of the seven come from the oil industry. At the table are TC Energy, Shell, Pembina Pipeline, Canadian Oil Sands Limited and Cenovus Energy. Meanwhile, scientists and Quebeckers do not have a seat at the table. If we are not at the table, are we on the menu?”
Statement grade
B
Average 79 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 62%Positioning 19%Promise 20%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 53 wordsfirst, the energy regulator in Calgary is the Canada Energy Regulator, just like the space agency in Saint-Hubert is the Canadian Space Agency.12 Regardless of where these organizations are located in the country, we have regulators that make us the envy of the world and that have access to sound evidence and science. Positioning · 16 wordsThe Bloc Québécois keeps throwing spaghetti at the wall, but unfortunately, none of it is sticking.PositioningOff point Promise · 17 wordsWe are going to move faster and provide jobs and economic opportunities for all Quebeckers and Canadians.Partly on pointVague promise

Analysed on