Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Nathalie Provost

Liberal on Building Canada Strong Act 2026-09-25

88 words · 3 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, I wonder if my colleague could provide her thoughts in regard to how the legislation is part of a bigger agenda the government has for building Canada stronger and healthier. A good example of that, as I have cited on numerous occasions, is the investment summit that the Prime Minister hosted, which generated close to half a trillion dollars of potential commitments coming to Canada. What impact is that going to have on our nation, and how is this legislation there to help support it?”

Statement grade

Average 94 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 8%Claims 53%Reasoning 39%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordswe have not said much about it, ProcedureClaims · 26 wordsbut almost half if not more of the projects discussed at the 2026 Canada Investment Summit that elicited considerable interest are projects focused on renewable energy.¹ Reasoning · 34 wordsHowever, to get these renewable energy projects built quickly and efficiently, and for Canadians to reap the full benefits, it is essential that proponents be given the tools they need to take effective action. Claims · 21 wordsAs a reminder, these timelines and this integrated work approach are already part of the philosophy espoused by Quebec’s environment ministry.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 90

1 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “we have not said much about it,”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 84

1 of 2 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “As a reminder, these timelines and this integrated work approach are already part of the philosophy espoused by Quebec’s environment ministry.”About Quebec’s environment ministry approach, touching the bill’s approach only in passing.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“almost half if not more of the projects discussed at the 2026 Canada Investment Summit”At the 2026 Canada Investment Summit hosted by the Prime Minister, almost half or more of the projects discussed were focused on renewable energy.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20