“Mr. Speaker, I have asked this question of other Liberal members and I am hoping that the parliamentary secretary, being so well briefed on the subject, will be able to shine some light on it. In part 3 of Bill C-39, there is a significant change to the geographic certification process. I would ask the good parliamentary secretary to please speak to it, to explain exactly what the government is trying to do and how significant this change would be. It used to be that only a union could ask for certification of this site, but what the government is planning is quite different than that. Also, is the government going to be putting any kind of charter statement on those provisions in the bill?”
Statement grade
B–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 78. The grade is held to 74, 30 above Relevance.
74 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 94%Procedure 6%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 86 wordswhat I can say about this bill is that it is going to speed up approval processes in this country, from an average of about five years to one year.1I think we can all agree that ambition is something that we share, that this country needs to build much faster, that regulatory review processes have lagged, Unearned certaintyand that the international best practices and standards in this country have weighed down on the possibility of Canada really putting capital to work and competing for global capital.Partly on pointProcedure · 8 wordsThat is really what we are focused on.ProcedureVague promiseClaims · 50 wordsI know that the bill also contains measures in terms of improving labour relations and ensuring that the 5% of cases that do not make it through a collective bargaining process have additional responsibilities and layers built in to ensure that the process can be successful for all parties involved.23Partly on point