Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Connie Cody

Conservative on Building Canada Strong Act 2026-10-05

26 words · 2 sentences · 2 clauses

Replying to Elizabeth May (Green). The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the bill.

“Mr. Speaker, I am always surprised when Conservatives agree so readily with Liberal talking points. The member mentioned that we wanted to have a project that attracted private investors. Does she not agree that a possible 10% from Pembina Pipeline is not a large stake in the project and that the taxpayers are paying for most of it?”

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 23%The ask 77%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 6 wordsthe hon. member is absolutely correct.Off point The ask · 20 wordsI think what we need to do is have the bill brought to committee so we can have further discussions.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 76

1 of 1 deductions are Relevance

The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the bill.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “the hon. member is absolutely correct.”It agrees with the member’s point about Pembina Pipeline funding, which is not about the bill.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-19