“Mr. Speaker, my colleague mentioned that she did not have enough time to discuss the bill in its entirety. One might also wonder whether a year is enough time for scientists to properly assess the impact of any projects that might be launched, especially given that this one year allows for 300 days for assessment and reporting, and then 65 days for the minister to make a decision. That does not even allow for the four full seasons that would be needed to determine whether certain projects actually have an impact on the natural environment. Does my colleague not see the risks involved in moving too quickly?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 74%Claims 26%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 12 wordsthis is why it is so important that we have a timeline.Claims · 27 wordsIn the past, a lot of infrastructure costs have risen because of delays in our projects due to delays in the decision-making process.There are exceptional circumstances, Reasoning · 65 wordsand this is why the Minister of Transport would have the authority to be able to make those exceptional decisions.1It is really important that at this time, a time of crisis, we are focusing on making sure we have a review process that has a timeline and that we get shovels in the ground, and this is exactly why the bill is really important.