Analysis · Reply to a comment · beta

Sukhman Gill

75 words · 7 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Dan Albas (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the member for Abbotsford—South Langley for his great presentation today. In his speech, he talked about the discretion given to the government and how once the clock starts, the authority or regulator can stop that clock if it is told to by the minister. However, proposed subsection 19(4) of the bill allows the authority to say that we need another study and another study, until it deems it as complete. This gives unfettered discretion to the bureaucracy, which could simply keep asking for more information and not deliver the “one year, one review” promise that the government purports to support.”
Statement grade
A–
Average 89 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 8%Claims 72%Reasoning 8%Positioning 12%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 6 wordsmy hon. colleague is completely right.Thanks Claims · 33 wordsWe see again and again that delays are being pushed back.Hidden agency It can be years and years. A one-year project can turn into a five-year project, or a 10-year project, for that matter. Reasoning · 6 wordsThis is the problem we see. Claims · 21 wordsWe do not see the necessities we need to bring forward so that projects can be completed in a streamlined process. Positioning · 9 wordsThat is what we are missing from the government.Positioning

Analysed on