Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Mark Carney

74 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Pierre Poilievre (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, the principal supplier of steel for the project will, again, be China. That is something we found out the very week the legendary company Stelco announced it was going to be laying off 350 people and idling its plant in Hamilton. The Prime Minister puts Canadian steelworkers out of a job and grants a permit for Beijing to dump its artificially subsidized steel on Canadian soil. Why can we not build Canadian with Canadian steel?”
Statement grade
A
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 58%Aside 20%Promise 22%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 16 wordsthere is a chance to build with Canadian steel. It is called the Pacific link pipeline.1 Aside · 15 wordsThe Leader of the Opposition might be sleeping and he might be in the ground, MockeryClaims · 27 wordsbut we are putting Canadian steel in the ground with the Pacific link pipeline. The workers of Stelco deserve better from their American-owned parent, 2which made representations.3 Promise · 16 wordsThis government will pursue it to the full force of the law to honour those commitments.Vague promise

Analysed on