Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Mark Carney

Liberal on Steel and Aluminum Industry 2026-10-05

68 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Pierre Poilievre (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, of course they deserve better from their American owner. Canadians deserve better than a Prime Minister who sends their tax dollars down to reward those same companies with purchases up 50% as a share of government purchases. We then have LNG phase two. It took the Liberals 10 years to get it going. Those steelworkers, who thought they might have a hope to supply the bones of that project, learned that the Prime Minister has sold them out and granted a permit for that steel to come from China. Why will he not put Canadians first, with Canadian steel in Canadian projects?”

Statement grade

A–

86 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 54%The ask 46%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 30 wordsthere is 15,000 tonnes of Canadian steel in Coastal GasLink for LNG phase two.¹ LNG phase two was approved less than two years from the start of LNG phase one.² The ask · 31 wordsThe Leader of the Opposition and all of the members of his party have a chance to stand up for Bill C-39 to get Canada building strong right across this country. Claims · 7 wordsThat is what this government is doing.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 56

3 of 3 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “LNG phase two was approved less than two years from the start of LNG phase one.”About the approval timeline of the LNG phases, not whether Canadian steel is being used.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “The Leader of the Opposition and all of the members of his party have a chance to stand up for Bill C-39 to get Canada building strong right across this country.”A call to support Bill C-39 on building across the country, not an answer on Chinese steel in LNG phase two.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “That is what this government is doing.”A general claim about the government’s work, tied to the bill and not to the steel question asked.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“15,000 tonnes of Canadian steel in Coastal GasLink”There are 15,000 tonnes of Canadian steel in the Coastal GasLink pipeline for LNG phase two.search
2“LNG phase two was approved less than two years from the start of LNG phase one”LNG phase two was approved less than two years after the start of LNG phase one.search

Analysed on 2026-10-19