“Mr. Speaker, making Quebeckers pay for a pipeline is not in the national interest. Things that we do believe are in Canada’s national interest are things like tackling climate change, protecting our culture from the web giants and supporting our forestry industry and our processors in the face of the tariffs. We also believe that it is not up to the Prime Minister alone to define what is in the national interest. Who does the Prime Minister think he is, to place his projects—which he chooses all by himself, in his office and according to his own personal definition of the national interest—above the law?”
Statement grade
A–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 89. The grade is held to 85, 30 above Relevance.
85 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 78 wordswith regard to this specific issue, we are following Bill C-39, the building Canada strong act.1The other major project I wanted to mention is the Churchill Falls project, which is in the interests of both Quebeckers and Canadians.The Government of Canada is making this project possible.2It is the largest investment in clean energy in history—not just in Canada, not just in Mexico, not just in the United States, 3but in the history of North America.Partly on point
