← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 88 / 100
Signal
88 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
75 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 31% Positioning 9% The question 60%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 13 words my question was for the Prime Minister, yet the public safety minister answered.1 Positioning · 7 words This is all talk and no results. Positioning Claims · 11 words I am meeting with Heather’s mom and her counsel on Thursday.2 The question · 47 words If the Prime Minister believes in what the public safety minister just said, will he meet with Heather’s mom and her counsel this Thursday and say what the minister just said? Does the Prime Minister have the guts to stand up and say it, yes or no? Insult
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning Insult Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “Does the Prime Minister have the guts to stand up and say it”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 88
1 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is all talk and no results.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 75
1 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Insult An insult aimed at a person. What the tags mean → “Does the Prime Minister have the guts to stand up and say it” It attributes a personal failing of courage to the Prime Minister himself rather than judging any decision or record.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “yet the public safety minister answered.” In question period on October 5, 2026, Frank Caputo’s question directed to the Prime Minister was answered by the public safety minister. search 2 “I am meeting with Heather’s mom and her counsel on Thursday” Frank Caputo is scheduled to meet with Heather’s mother and her counsel on Thursday, October 8, 2026. search
