Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Leah Gazan

NDP on Building Canada Strong Act 2026-10-05

82 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Dan Albas (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, in the member’s last answer, she talked about the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and how she believes in it. The last I checked, the Liberals like to say all the time that they are the party of the charter. Given that the section 107 provision in the Canada Labour Code raises questions around the right to strike, does the member support the Minister of Justice tabling a charter statement so that we can see whether or not the justice department believes the bill has captured and balanced those rights correctly?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 88%The ask 12%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 72 wordsabsolutely. I would just say this government totally lacks transparency about everything. I certainly support that. Once again, the Liberals are trying to fast-track legislation. Actually, the NDP is going further than that. I put forward a private member’s bill to totally repeal section 107 of the Canada Labour Code because of the Liberal government’s abuse of section 107, including the Air Canada workers’, port workers’ and CN workers’ right to strike.¹²³⁴ The ask · 10 wordsI hope the Conservatives will support my private member’s bill.

At a glance

AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“I put forward a private member’s bill to totally repeal section 107 of the Canada Labour Code”Leah Gazan has put forward a private member’s bill to totally repeal section 107 of the Canada Labour Code.search
2“the Liberal government’s abuse of section 107, including the Air Canada workers’, port workers’ and CN workers’ right to strike”The federal government used section 107 of the Canada Labour Code in interventions affecting Air Canada workers’ right to strike.search
3“the Air Canada workers’, port workers’ and CN workers’ right to strike”The federal government used section 107 of the Canada Labour Code in interventions affecting port workers’ right to strike.search
4“the Air Canada workers’, port workers’ and CN workers’ right to strike”The federal government used section 107 of the Canada Labour Code in interventions affecting CN workers’ right to strike.search

Analysed on 2026-10-19