“Mr. Speaker, the member opposite used the term “workers” several times throughout her speech and also talked about the changes to collective bargaining, particularly the need to have a transparent process. I take it that the member is in favour of Bill C-39 and the changes to the Labour Code, particularly to section 107. Does the member believe that the government should be transparent and submit to the House, through the Minister of Justice, a charter statement outlining the impacts on the charter rights of the workers she says she wants to protect?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 94 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 7%Claims 31%Reasoning 62%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 8 wordsmy colleague asked a question about section 107.ProcedureClaims · 27 wordsI will note that 95% of collective agreements in federally regulated sectors are reached without a work stoppage.1It is a very rare incident when this happens.Partly on pointReasoning · 21 wordsCertainly I am in favour of transparency and accountability, as is our government, which is why this legislation is being presented.Claims · 9 wordsAll of our legislation goes through rigorous charter testing.2Reasoning · 50 wordsThe last thing the government wants is to be brought into court on a charter challenge.I would rely on the work that has been done by the drafters of the legislation and by the minister in making sure that all legislation is charter-compliant when it comes to the House.