“Mr. Speaker, I would disagree with the member opposite. There is no surprise there. At the end of the day, conservation and having environmentally sound policies is something that we can in fact do while developing Canada’s economy. There are ample types of examples one could cite. One thing, based on the comments by the member for Winnipeg Centre with respect to indigenous people, is that we could take a look at the port of Churchill and its surroundings. There are indigenous-led businesses and indigenous communities getting behind an Arctic gateway through that point. Does the member not agree that we can in fact do both and advance the economy in major projects?”
Statement grade
A–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 87 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 6%Claims 91%Positioning 3%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 9 wordsthere is a big difference between conservation and preservation.Claims · 126 wordsIf we look at the definitions of what the 30 by 30 agenda and the 50 by 50 agenda are trying to achieve, we see that it is preservation status.1That is a national park level of status.It basically eliminates virtually all forms of use except for maybe visiting and taking pictures.If we were able to do the things on the preserved lands and waters that are coming through the legislative steps and the agenda the government currently has, we would have been able to build fire breaks in Jasper National Park to protect that community.2Instead, the preservationist philosophy, which the member is masquerading as conservation, required that the Liberals let it sit, go through the natural process and let those houses burn.3Motive imputedPositioning · 4 wordsThat is on him.PositioningOff point
