Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Judy A. Sgro

Liberal on Building Canada Strong Act 2026-10-05

79 words · 3 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Ellis Ross (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, in talking about indigenous consultation, there was a story that came out that said that the consultation for the Pacific link pipeline to Vancouver was going to be two months long. Does that reflect meaningful consultation of aboriginal rights and title?”

Statement grade

79 / 100, held down by Signal

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Aside 47%Claims 29%Reasoning 24%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Aside · 37 wordsI just have to say to the member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley that I was used to seeing someone else when the riding of Skeena—Bulkley Valley was mentioned, so it is nice to see the new member there.¹AsideOff point Claims · 23 wordsTwo months is not sufficient. I also do not believe three-quarters to 90% of what I read in newspapers or on social media, Reasoning · 19 wordsbecause there is so much disinformation and wrong information that unless I know something 100%, I just dismiss it.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 49

2 of 4 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

A remark off to the side of the point.What the tags mean “I just have to say to the member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley that I was used to seeing someone else when the riding of Skeena—Bulkley Valley was mentioned,”An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
A remark off to the side of the point.What the tags mean “so it is nice to see the new member there.”An aside: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

2 of 4 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “I just have to say to the member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley that I was used to seeing someone else when the riding of Skeena—Bulkley Valley was mentioned,”A personal aside about who used to hold the seat, not the consultation question.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “so it is nice to see the new member there.”A courtesy greeting to the new member, not the consultation question.

Respect · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the new member”The member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley is newly elected and is not the same person who previously held the seat.search

Analysed on 2026-10-19