← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 63. The grade is held to 58, 30 above Relevance. 58 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
32 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
28 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
93 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 13% Claims 35% Positioning 44% Procedure 8%
Structure · 7 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 13 words I thank the member opposite for his passion. It is an important question. Thanks Claims · 9 words The world is changing rapidly, as we all know. Unearned certainty Positioning · 12 words That is why this government is focused on what it can control. Positioning Partly on point Procedure · 8 words There are three themes to building Canada now: Procedure Claims · 25 words creating a more efficient and predictable coordination framework to attract more investment without delay, moving with speed, and expanding our trading relationship with reliable partners. Partly on point Positioning · 31 words We are not just paying attention to trade. We are also centred on workers and how we can move Canada forward for all collectively so we can thrive within our communities. Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×5 Positioning ×3 Thanks ×2 Off point ×2 Unearned certainty Procedure Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate. Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 32
6 of 14 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I thank the member opposite for his passion.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “It is an important question.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is why this government is focused on what it can control.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “There are three themes to building Canada now:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are not just paying attention to trade.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are also centred on workers and how we can move Canada forward for all collectively so we can thrive within our communities.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 28
7 of 14 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The world is changing rapidly,” About the changing world generally, not whether Highway 11 is among the projects of national interest.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “as we all know.” A general remark about shared awareness, not the highway question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That is why this government is focused on what it can control.” States the government’s general focus without addressing the specific highway question.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “creating a more efficient and predictable coordination framework to attract more investment without delay, moving with speed,” Describes the bill’s coordination framework generally, not the highway asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and expanding our trading relationship with reliable partners.” About trading relationships, not whether Highway 11 is part of the projects of national interest.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are not just paying attention to trade.” About attention to trade, a different subject from the highway question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are also centred on workers and how we can move Canada forward for all collectively so we can thrive within our communities.” About workers and communities, not the highway question asked.
Respect · 100
0 of 14 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 93
1 of 14 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “as we all know” It asserts shared knowledge as its backing instead of any source.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
