Analysis · Floor speech · beta

Dan Mazier

Conservative on Adjournment Proceedings 2026-10-05

116 words · 7 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 99 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 72%Procedure 3%The question 24%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 84 wordsthe taxpayer-funded CEO in charge of the $300-million PrescribeIT failure is suing Canada Health Infoway for $3 million in damages after he was fired.¹² Buried in the lawsuit is a very damning allegation. Michael Green claims that his firing “was timed in order to prevent his further testimony” before the health committee.³ In May, the Liberal health minister said in the House of Commons, “the CEO of Infoway’s behaviour was unacceptable.⁴ I spoke to the board of directors, and they took the necessary steps.”⁵ Procedure · 4 wordsMy question is simple.Procedure The question · 28 wordsDid the health minister instruct the board of directors to fire the PrescribeIT CEO in order to prevent him from testifying at the parliamentary committee, yes or no?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 96

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “My question is simple.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 5

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the $300-million PrescribeIT failure”PrescribeIT is a $300-million programme.search
2“the taxpayer-funded CEO in charge of the $300-million PrescribeIT failure is suing Canada Health Infoway for $3 million in damages after he was fired”The CEO in charge of PrescribeIT was fired and is suing Canada Health Infoway for $3 million in damages.search
3“Michael Green claims that his firing “was timed in order to prevent his further testimony” before the health committee”Michael Green’s lawsuit alleges his firing ‘was timed in order to prevent his further testimony’ before the health committee.search
4“the CEO of Infoway’s behaviour was unacceptable”In May, the health minister said in the House of Commons that ‘the CEO of Infoway’s behaviour was unacceptable’.search
5“they took the necessary steps”In May, the health minister said in the House of Commons that she spoke to the Infoway board of directors and ‘they took the necessary steps’.search

Analysed on 2026-10-19