Analysis · Speech on a motion · beta

Mario Simard

1310 words · 87 sentences · 106 clauses

Statement grade
A–
Average 89 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 12%Claims 53%Positioning 17%Anecdote 1%Aside 1%Procedure 4%Reasoning 12%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 22 wordslike my colleague from Mirabel, I would like to extend my sincere congratulations to the new Premier of Quebec, Paul St‑Pierre Plamondon.1Thanks Claims · 29 wordsI will point out that the Quebec National Assembly now has a majority of separatist members, if we add together the members of the Parti Québécois and Québec solidaire.2 Positioning · 9 wordsThat may be a good thing for the future.Positioning Thanks · 40 wordsI would also like to congratulate the candidates elected in my region, in Saguenay. I am thinking in particular of Marie‑Karlynn, with whom I loved working, and my young friend Émile Simard, who has the same name as my son.Thanks Anecdote · 16 wordsA few people sent congratulations to my son yesterday after Émile Simard was elected in Dubuc.3Anecdote Thanks · 31 wordsI am also thinking of my dear friend Jimmy Bouchard in Jonquière. I am really looking forward to working with him. I would also like to recognize the candidates who lost.Thanks Aside · 5 wordsPeople make friends in politics.Aside Thanks · 59 wordsI am particularly thinking of Yannick Gagnon of Coalition Avenir Québec, who lost the election in Jonquière.4 He is still a dedicated member of the community who cares deeply about making life better for the people in the Saguenay region. My hat goes off to him, and I hope that his future career will be everything he hopes for.Thanks Procedure · 6 wordsLet us return to the motion.Procedure Positioning · 34 wordsAs I often say, it is Groundhog Day: The Conservatives’ love affair with the oil and gas sector continues to repeat itself. Everything is an excuse to advance the interests of the oil companies.Positioning Procedure · 5 wordsThere is a contradiction here: ProcedureClaims · 27 wordsThe Conservatives are using their opposition day to argue that we should provide more support to the oil and gas sector so that it can export more. Positioning · 23 wordsEven with the rising cost of living, the Conservatives still see this as an opportunity to advance the interests of the oil companies.Positioning Claims · 16 wordsThe crisis in the Strait of Hormuz is driving up the price of diesel right now, Positioning · 25 wordsand the Conservatives see this as yet another opportunity to advance the interests of the oil companies. Perhaps they have managed to inspire the Liberals.Positioning Procedure · 7 wordsAs I will explain in my speech, ProcedurePositioning · 17 wordsso far, the world champions at advancing the interests of the oil companies have been the Liberals.Positioning Procedure · 7 wordsLet us return briefly to the motion.Procedure Reasoning · 28 wordsPersonally, as my colleague from Mirabel demonstrated very clearly, I do not believe that eliminating these taxes would help people who are being hit by higher diesel prices. Claims · 52 wordsInstead, as we know, it is the oil companies that will once again benefit from the handouts bestowed upon them by the government and the Conservative opposition.Unearned certainty A number of experts have said so. I am thinking in particular of Luc Godbout, as well as Normand Mousseau from the Trottier Energy Institute. Positioning · 30 wordsAt the end of the day, when we take a closer look, who are the big winners when a tax on gasoline or diesel is eliminated? It is big oil.Positioning Reasoning · 33 wordsTo me, it does not make sense to deprive the government of revenue in order to support the profiteers in the oil and gas sector. I do not see the logic in that. Claims · 31 wordsAs we know, the needs are immense.Unearned certainty Think about education and the health transfers, which are often lacking. A balanced federal budget is far from a certainty. The deficit is skyrocketing. Reasoning · 38 wordsI do not think we need to make matters worse by eliminating the diesel tax. Instead, as my colleague from Mirabel said very clearly, we need to find targeted measures to support the people who are hardest hit. Procedure · 4 wordsLet us be clear: ProcedureReasoning · 20 wordsreducing government revenue so that everyone has to pay more, while increasing oil companies’ profits, is a very bad idea. Procedure · 8 wordsThat said, I want to address another issue.Procedure Positioning · 18 wordsLet us talk about the federal government’s lavish generosity and shamelessness when it comes to oil and gas.Positioning Procedure · 16 wordsI am going to share some staggering figures. Rest assured, they will evoke some strong feelings.Procedure Claims · 66 wordsBetween 2021 and 2024, oil and gas companies raked in $131 billion in profits.5 Of that $131 billion in profits, $80 billion was paid out as dividends to oil and gas companies.6 I would like to point out that 80% of Canada’s oil and gas companies are owned by foreign interests.7 Of that 80%, approximately 60% are American.8 We are talking about $80 billion in dividends. Reasoning · 15 wordsThat means that every year, $12.5 billion leaves Canada and goes to the United States.9 Claims · 57 wordsWe are in a trade war. That is $12.5 billion flowing directly from Canada to the United States, based on the period from 2021 to 2024. In July of this year, Cenovus announced that it would post record profits for its second quarter.10 It posted a profit of $2.8 billion, four times as much as in 2025.11 Positioning · 6 wordsWhat are we being told today?Positioning Claims · 36 wordsThe Conservatives are once again proposing handouts for the oil and gas sector. Meanwhile, the government, with the support of the Conservatives, wants to make Canada an energy superpower. The Prime Minister has said so repeatedly. Reasoning · 16 wordsWhen we look at the situation, we have to ask where Canada’s energy exports are going. Claims · 73 wordsBetween 70% and 80% of our energy exports go directly to the United States.12 We are in a tariff war with the U.S. The U.S. is our main customer when it comes to energy exports. One of the only products not subject to tariffs is oil.13 If we take a closer look at the export figures, we will see that, in 2025, 91% of our oil exports went directly to the United States.14 Reasoning · 6 wordsWhat is the federal government’s strategy? Claims · 24 wordsIts strategy is to say that we need to build oil and gas infrastructure so our economy can resist pressure from the United States. Positioning · 7 wordsWho benefits from building this infrastructure, though?Positioning Procedure · 5 wordsThis is the outrageous part.Procedure Claims · 50 wordsNew infrastructure benefits the greedy oil and gas companies that do not want to pay for it, and it also directly benefits Americans. The government is using public money to pay for oil and gas infrastructure for the profiteers in the energy sector. Ultimately, that benefits the Americans collecting dividends. Positioning · 9 wordsI think that is as absurd as it gets.Positioning Claims · 53 wordsThe economic sectors subject to tariffs are receiving little to no support from the government. We paid $34 billion for the Trans Mountain pipeline.15 Each and every one of us paid for it. The Leader of the Opposition had the decency to point out that oil and gas companies were corporate welfare recipients. Aside · 5 wordsI rarely agree with him, AsideReasoning · 4 wordsbut he was right. Claims · 6 wordsThese companies are making record profits, Positioning · 10 wordsyet they do not want to pay for their infrastructure.Positioning Claims · 105 wordsWhat is more, the government is adding insult to injury by saying that it will fund another project, the Pacific link pipeline, which will cost about $43 billion.16 That is $34 billion spent on the Trans Mountain expansion project and $43 billion spent on the Pacific link pipeline. It is also important to note that, last year, the fossil fuel industry received $10 billion in subsidies.17 That brings the total up to about $85 billion. I am not talking about the construction of Trans Mountain; I am talking about the financial support provided by the federal government. This support amounts to $85 billion since 2020.18 Positioning · 31 wordsIt is clear that the federal government has made its bed. Its main goal in the tariff crisis is to support the only sector that is not subject to tariffs: oil.Positioning Claims · 67 wordsIt is also the only sector that primarily serves Americans, since they are the majority owners of the oil and gas companies. Canada is investing billions of dollars in this industry. What the Conservatives are asking us to do today is to be even more generous and eliminate a tax. Once again, this would mean that taxpayers would end up footing the bill for these greedy companies. Positioning · 3 wordsIt is outrageous.Positioning

Analysed on