“Mr. Speaker, I am honoured to put a question to my esteemed colleague, the former minister. My question relates specifically to the oil industry. I have previously given a speech about the ownership of the fossil fuel sector in Canada, which is largely controlled by American interests. I would like to ask the former minister whether he agrees with me that we would be better off shifting our energy policy toward Canadian industries.”
Statement grade
B+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 85. The grade is held to 83, 30 above Signal.
83 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 32%Procedure 9%Claims 60%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 40 wordsI thank my colleague, who is unfortunately a little further away from me physically than she was before.I have always had excellent conversations with this member, whose experience and expertise inspire many other less experienced members in the House.ThanksProcedure · 11 wordsI would like to say that there are indeed two issues.ProcedureClaims · 75 wordsThe first is obviously to protect Canadian workers, including those in the oil and gas sector.Partly on pointThe second is to ensure that the profits and control associated with that industry remain in Canada as much as possible.This is part of a broader approach by the Canadian government to ensure sovereignty, not only in terms of energy, but also in terms of the economy, particularly when it comes to controlling large properties and major industries.
