Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Bob Zimmer

98 words · 4 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Marilyn Gladu (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, of course, our government is committed to reducing taxes for Canadians. We brought forward Bill C-38 to take the tax off all fuel. I think, and hope, the member opposite would agree that it is very difficult to predict the situation globally in terms of the Strait of Hormuz and the various wars that are coming. Would he not agree that the prudent thing is to continue to monitor the situation and introduce responsive affordability measures as we know more about the global situation?”
Statement grade
B
78 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 47%Claims 53%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 25 wordsI think that is a little bit vague. We have already seen sort of a muted response to these high diesel prices from the Liberals.PositioningPartly on point Claims · 52 wordsOur plan is just a lot more thorough and a lot more effective: emergency prepermitting and tax relief would eliminate all taxes on diesel consumption until at least Canada Day, permanently eliminate taxes on diesel production and then even boost what we have as a reserve to one million barrels per day.1 Positioning · 21 wordsOur plan would be a much more effective response to not only this diesel crisis, but similar crises in the future.Positioning

Analysed on