“Mr. Speaker, shortly, I will get the opportunity to provide more detail on the specifics of the Conservative motion, but I want to take up the member’s comments. The Conservatives seem to have this fixation on going back to Justin Trudeau. I will provide some further comment on that also, but I think it is important to recognize that there was a change in government when our new Prime Minister was elected. Since the last federal election, we have seen significant movements, whether in tax relief or commitments to build. We are talking about Pacific link. We are talking about LNG Canada phase two. These are significant ways we are supporting the economy while at the same time dealing with the issue of affordability. Would the member not recognize that?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 91 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 29%Claims 55%Reasoning 17%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 12 wordswhat I do recognize are commitments to do something at some point.PositioningClaims · 17 wordsI will go back to Bill C-5, which Conservatives helped the Liberals pass, the Building Canada Act, 1Reasoning · 19 wordsbecause we wanted to be there to support building Canadian projects, nation-building projects, at speeds not seen in generations.Claims · 46 wordsNothing happened.We now have the building Canada strong act because the first one was not enough.2I am expecting that about a year from now, we will have another bill from the Liberal government.It will be called the building Canada really, really strong act, Positioning · 21 wordsbecause we could not get it right the first two times.That is what I am expecting from the Liberal government.Positioning
